MHB Prove Inequality: $m,n,k\in N$, $m>1,n>1$

Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$m,n,k\in N$, and $m>1,n>1$
prove :
$(3^{m+1}-1)\times (5^{n+1}-1)\times(7^{k+1}-1)>98\times 3^m\times 5^n\times7^k$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
becauase m > 1and n > 1
$(3^{m+1}-1)\times (5^{n+1}-1)\times(7^{k+1}-1)$
= $3^m(3- \frac{1}{3^m})\times 5^n(5-\frac{1}{5^n})\times 7^k(7- \frac{1}{7^k})$
= $3^m\times 5^n \times 7^k (3- \frac{1}{3^m})(5-\frac{1}{5^n})(7- \frac{1}{7^k})$
$\ge \ 3^m\times 5^n \times 7^k (3- \frac{1}{3^2})(5-\frac{1}{5^2})(7- \frac{1}{7})$ putting minimum values of m,n,k
$\ge 98.25 \times 3^m\times 5^n \times 7^k$ (used a calculator)
$\gt 98 \times 3^m\times 5^n \times 7^k$
 
kaliprasad said:
becauase m > 1and n > 1
$(3^{m+1}-1)\times (5^{n+1}-1)\times(7^{k+1}-1)$
= $3^m(3- \frac{1}{3^m})\times 5^n(5-\frac{1}{5^n})\times 7^k(7- \frac{1}{7^k})$
= $3^m\times 5^n \times 7^k (3- \frac{1}{3^m})(5-\frac{1}{5^n})(7- \frac{1}{7^k})$
$\ge \ 3^m\times 5^n \times 7^k (3- \frac{1}{3^2})(5-\frac{1}{5^2})(7- \frac{1}{7})$ putting minimum values of m,n,k
$\ge 98.25 \times 3^m\times 5^n \times 7^k$ (used a calculator)
$\gt 98 \times 3^m\times 5^n \times 7^k$
nice solution!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top