Solving Inequality Problem: (|a|+|b|≥2(|c|+|d|))

  • Thread starter Thread starter drago
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the inequality |a| + |b| ≥ 2(|c| + |d|) and its implications for proving (c + a)² + (d + b)² ≥ c² + d². Participants express difficulty in deriving a proof for the stronger form of the inequality, despite initial thoughts that it might be straightforward. One contributor mentions achieving a weaker result by assuming |b| ≥ |a| and |c| ≥ |d|, but acknowledges this approach sacrifices generality. The challenge remains unsolved, with a consensus that the problem is intriguing yet complex. The thread highlights the need for further exploration of the inequality's implications.
drago
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I would appreciate some ideas on the following problem:

We are given the inequality:
(1)
|a| + |b| >= 2(|c| + |d|)

Can we conclude that:
(2)
(c + a)^2 + (d + b)^2 >= c^2 + d^2 ?

a, b, c, d are real.

I can prove (2) if (1) is in the form: |a| + |b| >= 4max(|c|,|d|), but the above is stronger.

Thank you.
drago
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
i feel its true
its seems so easy but at 12.30 midnight i cannot think of anything! :frown:

-- AI
 
i feel its true
its seems so easy but at 12.30 midnight i cannot think of anything!

Yep I looked at it for a few minutes late last night and thought it looked easy but couldn't come up with much. I got another weaker result pretty easy but then decided to leave it for someone else.

BTW, I got the weaker result by assumming (without loss of generality) that |b| >= |a|. I then found that if I made the additional imposition that |c|>=|d| then I was able to prove the desired result pretty easily . This however definitely does give a loss of generality and hence a weaker result.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top