Quantum chromodynamics and gravity

kurious
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
A graviton is supposedly massless and has spin 2.
But these characteristics of the graviton come from quantum mechanics
in which it is assumed that the graviton does not interact with other
force carrying particles.Is it possible that a graviton has a colour
charge for example, and interacts with gluons - a graviton is expected
to have very little energy and it would not interfere noticeably with
the mathematics of
quantum chromodynamics theory, but would the colour force have a
significant effect on gravity? Could the force of gravity be so weak
compared to the other
field forces because gluons take energy from gravitons? Because dark
energy accounts for most of the mass of the universe this would mean
that the colour
force would have to be associated with dark energy.Is this a
ridiculous idea or something that is reasonably possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


There is currently no scientific evidence to suggest that a graviton has a color charge and interacts with gluons. The theory of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) describes the interactions between quarks and gluons, which are the fundamental particles that make up protons and neutrons. However, gravity is described by the theory of general relativity, which is a classical theory and does not take into account the quantum nature of particles.

While it is always important to explore new ideas and theories, it is also important to base them on scientific evidence and established theories. Currently, there is no evidence to support the idea that the force of gravity is weak because gluons take energy from gravitons. Dark energy is a separate concept that is thought to be responsible for the accelerating expansion of the universe, but its exact nature is still not fully understood.

In summary, the idea that a graviton has a color charge and interacts with gluons is not supported by current scientific evidence. While it is an interesting concept to explore, it is not a reasonable possibility at this time. It is important to continue studying and researching in order to further our understanding of the universe and its fundamental forces.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top