Inertia and a Rocket that doesn't accelerate anymore

AI Thread Summary
On an Earth-like planet without an atmosphere, a rocket can accelerate but eventually stops accelerating while still having enough speed to move away from the planet. Once the rocket's engine stops, the astronaut inside will no longer feel the pressure of acceleration and will enter a state of free fall. In this scenario, the astronaut will float inside the rocket due to the absence of thrust and ground contact. Inertia is still present, as it requires effort to change motion within the rocket. The key point is that without acceleration, the astronaut experiences weightlessness despite the rocket's speed.
LM542
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Let's say we are on Earth-like planet, but without an athmosphere.
There's a rocket on the ground and it's starting now. The rocket accelerates but at a point when it has enough speed it stops accelerating. The rocket has still enough speed to get further away from the planet but not enough to escape the planets gravity field.

So the rocket has stopped to accelerate but still has enough speed to get further away from the planet, does an astronaut now feel any kind of inertia? Is he floating in the rocket?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rocket blast accelerates the rocket. It is the rocket pushing on the "astronaut" that she feels as pressure. When the rocket stops, she no longer feels that and will be in "free fall".
 
HallsofIvy said:
The rocket blast accelerates the rocket. It is the rocket pushing on the "astronaut" that she feels as pressure. When the rocket stops, she no longer feels that and will be in "free fall".
What do you exactly mean with "stops"? When the acceleration stops or when the rocket reaches the point when it falls down back on the planet.
 
By "the rocket stops" I meant when the rocket engine stops so there is no more acceleration. I should have said "engine". Thanks for asking so I could clarify that.
 
LM542 said:
but still has enough speed to get further away from the planet
That does not matter, by the way.

An astronaut will always feel inertia (it takes some effort to accelerate inside the rocket), but if we have no atmosphere and the rocket is not using thrusters*, the astronaut will always float inside the rocket.

*and assuming the rocket does not have ground contact, of course
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top