Inertial Charges: Magnetic Forces Relative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Charlie G
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Inertial
AI Thread Summary
A charge moving at a constant speed does generate a magnetic field, but this field is perceived differently by observers in varying frames of reference. An observer on a plane with a stationary charge would only detect an electric field, while someone on the ground would observe both electric and magnetic fields. The magnitude of the magnetic field is proportional to the speed of the charge relative to the speed of light. This discussion highlights the relativity of electromagnetic fields and how they depend on the observer's perspective. Understanding these principles enhances the appreciation of physics and its underlying concepts.
Charlie G
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
I was wondering whether or not a charge must be accelerating to produce a magnetic field. If the charge is moving at a constant speed does it create a magnetic field? I f I took a van de graff generator onto an airplane moving at a constant rate, could I measure a magnetic force? Or are magnetic forces relative? Do I in the plane see an electric force while a person on the ground sees a magnetic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A charge at constant speed generates a magnetic field.

In your plane you would see an electric field and the people on the ground would see both an electric and a magnetic field.
 
Charlie G said:
I was wondering whether or not a charge must be accelerating to produce a magnetic field. If the charge is moving at a constant speed does it create a magnetic field? I f I took a van de graff generator onto an airplane moving at a constant rate, could I measure a magnetic force? Or are magnetic forces relative? Do I in the plane see an electric force while a person on the ground sees a magnetic?

Yeah. For example, I you are on a plane holding a point charge on your lap, you only see an electrostatic field. But, a person on the ground sees an electric and a magnetic field; the magnitude of the magnetic field is about v/c times the magnitude of the electric field (in gaussian units where electric and magnetic field have same units) and roughly "curls around" the charge a la the right-hand-rule.
 
thx for the replies, of all the relative things, time, space and so on, this relative electromagnetsim seems to me the strangest.
 
Charlie G said:
thx for the replies, of all the relative things, time, space and so on, this relative electromagnetsim seems to me the strangest.

It is pretty interesting, isn't it? This sort of thing is what got me hooked on physics in the first place. I.e., the impressive general principles (like relativity) and the neat effects that look almost magical (like moving magnets inducing currents, and so on). Cheers.
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi CharlieG! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Charlie G said:
thx for the replies, of all the relative things, time, space and so on, this relative electromagnetsim seems to me the strangest.

Perhaps it makes more sense if you look at it from the point of view of the observer, rather than of the charge.

In other words, don't say "a stationary charge produces a pure electic field",

but "a charge produces an electromagnetic field which an observer stationary relative to the charge sees as a pure electic field" :wink:

oh … and happy new year! :smile:
 
Yea, I've really been trying to get my head around physics because for me it seems that when you understand something you appreciate a whole lot more. Ever since reading my first relativity book I can't help but imagine everything I see from another perspective. I think the best part is how when you learn the simple the simple principles behind small things, all the bigger ones fall right into place.
 
Back
Top