Infimum and supremum of empty set

strobeda
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I can't wrap my mind around this:

inf∅= ∞
sup∅= - ∞

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
inf∅ is artificially defined to be ∞ so that inf will work well. Suppose we had defined inf∅ = 998 and we had a set with one element, 999. Then we want inf({999}) = 999. But since ∅ is also a subset of {999}, we would have inf({999}) = inf∅ = 998. The only way to avoid this problem is to make inf∅ greater than any possible number. So inf∅ = ∞. Similarly we have to define sup∅ smaller than any possible number. So sup∅ = -∞.

In a sense, this is just getting ∅ out of the way of the calculation of inf and sup.
 
Indeed, it gets ∅ out of the way!

Thank you very much, FactChecker!
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top