Infinite array of charged wires

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving for the function F(n) related to the electric field above an infinite array of charged wires, as described in Feynman's Lectures. The initial confusion arises from the application of a delta function to represent the wires, which does not yield the correct coefficients for the Fourier series. The correct expression for F(n) is found to be lambda/(2pi*n*epsilon_0), derived from manipulating the infinite series for the field. The participants clarify that the Fourier coefficients of the potential, rather than the charge density, are essential for accurate calculations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between the electric field and Fourier analysis in this context.
Fr33Fa11
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
In the Feynman Lectures, Volume II, Chapter 7, the final two pages (7-10 and 7-11), Feynman describes an infinite array of parallel charged wires and uses a Fourier series to solve for the field above them. He shows that the series can be expressed entirely in terms of cosine terms and that the coefficients have the value F(n)*e^(-z/k) where n is the order of the term, z is the distance from the plane of the wires, and k is a constant. What I don't understand is how one would then find the function F(n) (which he does not show). Later (in chapter 12 of the same volume) says that F(1) is twice the average field strength and that solving for the function F(n) is straightforward (in relation to another, related problem).
How would you go about solving for the function?
I've found the field via the coulomb interaction at several points where symmetry makes it easy but I'm not sure how this helps.
Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The parallel charged wires can be represented as an array of delta functions spaced a apart (times \lambda, the linear charge density of the wires). Then it would just be the Fourier Series of a delta function.

<br /> F_n = \frac{2}{a} \int_{-a/2}^{a/2} \lambda\delta(x) \cos \frac{2n\pi x}{a} \, dx = 2\lambda<br />
 
I just solved it last night. The delta function approach doesn't produce the correct answer; F(n)=lambda/(2pi*n*epsilon_0) (sorry I'm not sure how to embed latex into the forums). I found this by manipulating the infinite series for the field a distance a directly above one of the wires into a form which, when expanded, gave a function along the lines of e^(-n). (The field is related to the hyperbolic cotangent of pi*z/a).
 
You're right. My delta function approach doesn't work because the Fourier coefficients of the potential are what's needed, not the charge density.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top