Calculating Probability with Infinite Product: 0.28

  • Thread starter Thread starter learnfrench
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite Product
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the probability related to an infinite product, specifically \prod_{j=1}^{\infty}\frac{2^{j}-1}{2^{j}}, which approximates to 0.28. This product is linked to the probability of a binary matrix being nonsingular. The constant derived from this infinite product is referred to as Q, particularly in the context of digital tree searching. Additional resources are provided for further exploration of infinite products and tree searching concepts. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of finding a definitive formula for this probability calculation.
learnfrench
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am actually trying to calculate a probability and hitting upon the infinite product:

\prod_{j=1}^{\infty}\frac{2^{j}-1}{2^{j}}

Any idea what this might be (it's about 0.28, but I want the formula).
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
learnfrench said:
I am actually trying to calculate a probability

that a binary matrix is nonsingular?

http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A048651 is the constant. There are several formulas there, but probably none that are 'the formula' you hoped to find.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top