Infinite sum proof by induction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the infinite sum ∑_{k=1}^{∞} (6^k)/((3^k - 2^k)(3^{k+1} - 2^{k+1})). The user initially struggles to prove a key equation necessary for their induction hypothesis, specifically that 3^{n+1} - 2^{n+1} + 6^{n-1} equals (3^n - 2^n)². After realizing an error in their formulation, they correct it to (3^{n-1} - 2^{n-1})(3^{n+1} - 2^{n+1}) + 6^{n-1} = (3^n - 2^n)². With this correction, they successfully prove their hypothesis.
Doom of Doom
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
So I am trying to solve a problem.

Evaluate \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{6^{k}}{(3^{k}-2^{k})(3^{k+1}-2^{k+1})}.

Essentially, I've boiled it down to this, but I can't quite prove it:
\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{6^{k}}{(3^{k}-2^{k})(3^{k+1}-2^{k+1})}=\frac{6(3^{n}-2^{n})}{(3^{n+1}-2^{n+1})}
and the limit of this as n approaches infinity is 2.

I need to be able to prove that 3^{n+1}-2^{n+1}+6^{n-1}=(3^{n}-2^{n})^{2} in order for my induction hypothesis to work, and I'm having trouble for some reason. Help?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Doom of Doom said:
I need to be able to prove that 3^{n+1}-2^{n+1}+6^{n-1}=(3^{n}-2^{n})^{2} in order for my induction hypothesis to work, and I'm having trouble for some reason. Help?

Perhaps beacuse it isn't true, consider n=3 then

3^(3+1)-2^(3+1)+6^(3-1)=81-16+36=101
whereas
(3^3-2^3)^2=(27-8)^2=(19)^2=361
 
Wow, I'm sorry. Perhaps that's why I was unable to do it. My notes are all over the place and I guess I kind of lost track of a lot of numbers somewhere.

I meant to have (3^{n-1}-2^{n-1})(3^{n+1}-2^{n+1})+6^{n-1}=(3^{n}-2^{n})^{2}

Now I'm able to prove it! Thanks anyway.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top