MHB Infinitely many least-square solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
I quote a question from Yahoo! Answers

Hard Linear Algebra Q: Find a least-square solution of the inconsistent system Ax=b.?
1 1 0 0 = A
1 1 0 0
1 0 1 0
1 0 1 0
1 0 0 1
1 0 0 1

7 = b
8
0
2
4
1The answer options are:
A) [5/2, 5, -7/2, 0] + x4[-1, 1, 1, 1]
B) [5/2, 5, -3/2, 0] + x4[-1, 1, 1, 1]
C) [5/4, 5, -3/2, 0] + x4[-1, 1, 1, 0]
D) [5/2, 4, -3/2, 0] + x4[-1, -1, 1, 1]

I have given a link to the topic there so the OP can see my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
According to a well known theorem, the least squares solutions of $Ax=b$ are the solutions of the consistent system $A^TAx=A^Tb$. In our case, you'll get;

$$A^TAx=A^Tb \Leftrightarrow \begin{bmatrix}{6}&{2}&{2}&{2}\\{2}&{2}&{0}&{0}\\{2}&{0}&{2}&{0}\\ {2}&{0}&{0}&{2}\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}{x_1}\\{x_2}\\{x_3}\\{x_4}\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}{22}\\{15}\\{2}\\{5}\end{bmatrix}$$
Now, solve the last system using the Gauss method and you'll find solutions of the form $a+x_4v$ with $a,v\in\mathbb{R}^4$ and $x_4\in\mathbb{R}$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top