Why Can't Information Travel Faster Than Light Without Breaking Causality?

alpha_wolf
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
"Information cannot travel faster than c"
"If information could travel faster than c, we would loose causality"
Just wandering - who came up with these and why? In other words:
1. Why can't information travel at some higher finite speed?
2. Why would we loose causality in that case?

Note that I'm posting here in the relativity forum, since I suspect this has much to do with relativity... Was this Einstein's idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's based on Special Relativity -- information traveling faster than c breaks cause an effect.

The basic geometric cause of the paradox is this: If, in one reference frame, information travels from point A to point B, then there are other reference frames in which the same piece of information travels from point B to point A.

That is, when information is transmitted faster than c, it is impossible to tell the difference between the source and the destination!

With a little care, you can arrange fun paradoxes, such as FTL transmission of information that's "supposed" to from A to B then back to A, but it arrives back at A before it was ever sent! Thus it is said to violate causality -- it violates the "law" cause and effect.
 
alpha_wolf said:
"Information cannot travel faster than c"
"If information could travel faster than c, we would loose causality"
Just wandering - who came up with these and why? In other words:
1. Why can't information travel at some higher finite speed?
2. Why would we loose causality in that case?

Note that I'm posting here in the relativity forum, since I suspect this has much to do with relativity... Was this Einstein's idea?

This may or may not answer your question, but this paper is barely 2 weeks old...

http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/8/11/10/1

Zz.
 
information cannot travel faster then c because we would loose causality...This is a consequence of the special theory of relativity where c is postulated to be constant for all observers. This was an idea from Einstein.

Loosing causlity is not allowed because this is not physical. It means that the consequence of some action can occur before the actual action... Something like you die before you are born...this is crazy talk, wouldn't you say?

marlon
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top