Information transfer that is faster than c?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Puma24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Information
Puma24
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
If I were to have some material, that was rigid, and was also say, 300,000,000 metres long. If I were to poke it at one end, would another observer see an instantaneous response at the other end? Ie, would the information I put into one end of the material travel faster than the speed of light to the other end?

I guess it woudln't be so easy. I assume that poking it counts as a sort of pressure wave that would have to be transferred through all the electrostatic processes along the way, which would be limited by c? Then I guess, can you argue that there is such thing as an incompressible material? (at least in regards to the force of my jabbing finger)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Puma24 said:
I guess it woudln't be so easy. I assume that poking it counts as a sort of pressure wave that would have to be transferred through all the electrostatic processes along the way, which would be limited by c? Then I guess, can you argue that there is such thing as an incompressible material? (at least in regards to the force of my jabbing finger)

Correct, the electromagnetic processes have to carry the information the whole way, and no, by your previous thought process, you can't have an incompressible material.
 
Alright then. So if we had the power to observe the material, would we see the side I poke move slightly, and then a sort of compression wave propogate through the material (like you could imagine a sound wave compressing air), warping the dimensions as it goes? Do you know if the speed of this wave has a speed that is constant, or is a consequence of the materials properties, like density I guess?
 
Puma24 said:
and then a sort of compression wave propogate through the material (like you could imagine a sound wave compressing air),
I believe it literally is a sound wave.
 
Hurkyl said:
I believe it literally is a sound wave.
Yes. And the speed at which the wave propogates is the speed of sound in that material.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top