Initial Speed of Hanging Mass (HW Check)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mass hanging from a string and its motion along a circular path, specifically examining the speed of the mass at a certain point when given an initial speed. The subject area includes concepts of energy conservation and kinematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of energy equation and its application to the problem, questioning the validity of the initial calculations and assumptions about potential energy at different points. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between initial and final speeds and the height of point A.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on re-evaluating the energy conservation equation and suggested breaking down the problem into components to clarify the relationships involved. Multiple interpretations of the height and energy states are being explored, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of information regarding the mass of the object, which is not provided in the problem statement. Additionally, there are concerns about unit consistency, particularly between centimeters and meters.

Masrat_A

Homework Statement


A mass hangs from a light string of length 45cm attached at its other end to the ceiling. If the mass is given an initial speed of 5m/s, what is its speed when it reaches point A in its circular path (see Figure 1)?

https://imgur.com/a/ERdlD

Homework Equations


##E_i = E_f##
##KE_i + PE_i = KE_f + PE_f##

The Attempt at a Solution


##1/2mv_o^2 + mgd = 1/2v^2 + 0##
##v_o^2 + 2gd = v^2##
##2(10)(14) + 5^2 = v^2##
##17.46 = v##

I feel like there is something I'm missing, but I can't quite catch what it is...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are missing something very big. If the initial speed is 5 m/s, can the final speed at A be more than three times that? Check your energy conservation equation.
 
I've thought about it, but I still can't see what went wrong... could you please give a bit more detail?

I've noticed I've made an error in my calculation:

##2(10)(14) + 5^2 = v^2##
##17.46 = v##

But the result is still much higher than initial speed:

##2(10)(45) + 5^2 = v^2##
##30.41 = v##

Should I make it so that final speed would equal initial? Point A having the same velocity as starting point does make sense to me in some capacity.

##2(10)(45) = v^2 + 5^2##
##30 = v + 25##
##5 = v##

Update: Point A would have the same potential energy as starting. Therefore:

##1/2mv_o^2 + mgd = 1/2v^2 + mgd##
##v_o^2 + 2gd = v^2 + 2gd##
##v_o^2 = v^2##
##25 = v^2##
##5 = v##
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Masrat_A said:
Point A would have the same potential energy as starting.
That would be the case if point A were at the same height as the starting point. Is that true?

Perhaps you should do this piecewise. Fill in the blanks first

1. KEi = _____

2. PEi = _____

3. KEf = _____

4. PEf = _____

and then write the conservation of energy equation. You might see what you are doing wrong more clearly.
 
kuruman said:
That would be the case if point A were at the same height as the starting point. Is that true?

Perhaps you should do this piecewise. Fill in the blanks first

1. KEi = _____

2. PEi = _____

3. KEf = _____

4. PEf = _____

and then write the conservation of energy equation. You might see what you are doing wrong more clearly.

No, that is not right. I'm thinking the height of starting point would be rather -45cm, and at point A, we have 0.

1. KEi = ##1/2mv_o^2## = 25
2. PEi = ##mgd## = -875
3. KEf = ##1/2v^2## = ?
4. PEf = ##mgd## = 0
 
More points to consider.

1. The statement of the problem does not give value for the mass. What did you use for it to get your numbers? It turns out you don't need the mass to answer this question, but you cannot assume a number and use it because it might lead you to erroneous results.
2. You are mixing units, cm for the radius and m/s for the speed.
3. What happened to the mass in your expression for KEf?
4. Finally, I strongly recommend that you first solve the problem algebraically to get an expression for the final speed in terms of g, d and v0 and then substitute the numbers. It is a good habit that will serve you well in the future.
 
I see; here is another attempt.

1. KEi = ##1/2mv_o^2## = 25
2. PEi = ##mgd## = -9
3. KEf = ##1/2mv^2## = ?
4. PEf = ##mgd## = 0

##1/2mv_o^2## + ##mgd## = ##1/2mv^2## + 0

The masses cancel each other, thus...

##v_o^2## + ##2gd## = ##v^2##

Converting cm to m, we have:

##5^2## + ##2(10)(-0.45)## = ##v^2##
##16## = ##v^2##
##v = 4##
 
That looks correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K