A Injective immersion and embedding

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Korybut
  • Start date Start date
Korybut
Messages
73
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
Why local closedness matters?
Hello!

There is a simple line in the textbook.

If ##S## is a manifold, an injectively immersed submanifold ##M## of ##S## is embedded if and only if ##M## is locally closed in ##S##.

Recall the definition. M is locally closed if for each point ##x\in M## there open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##.

Embedding to injective immesion is simple. The opposite direction is hard.

Suppose I have ##N## as source manifold and ##f:N\rightarrow S## is the injective immersion. I need to show that "immersed" topology coincides with subspace topology. In other words: for any open ##V \subset N## I need to show that ##f(V)=M\cap U_V## where ##U## is open in S.

Immersion allows to use constant rank theorem and build chart ##(A,\phi)## with ##\phi : A \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^k## for ##A\subset N##; and chart ##(B,\psi)## with ##\psi: B\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{n+k}## for ##B\subset S##. In these charts immersion has the form
##\psi \circ f \circ \phi^{-1} :\mathbb{R}^k \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{n+k}##
##(x_1,...,x_k)\rightarrow (x_1,...,x_k,0,...0)##.

How do I proceed further?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As it happens usually once you post you are full of ideas

I have the following sketch of the proof. Since ##f(N)=M## is locally closed for any point ##x\in M## there is open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##.
By assumption ##f:N\rightarrow S## is continuous. Therefore I define open in ##N## set ##V##
##V:=f^{-1}(U)\subset N##
Also we can consider restriction of ##f##, namely ##f|_V##
##f|_V :V\rightarrow f(N)\cap U##
This map is bijective (since ##f## is assumed injective) and continuous in the direction ##V\rightarrow f(N)\cap U## (by assumption).

Tricky part is to show ##f|_V {}^{-1}## is continuous. I believe this is where that M is locally closed is handy.
Since ##V## and ##M\cap U## are manifolds one consider convergent sequences and prove the continuous property of ##f|_V {}^{-1}## from sequential definition.
Suppose I pick a convergent sequence ##{f(p_n)}\in f(M)\cap U##. Since set ##f(M)\cap U## is closed (in ##U##) it contains all limit points. So
##\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} f|_V {}^{-1}(f(p_n))=p##
with some ##p## that comes from bijective property of f. I.e. for the limit ##\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} f(p_n)=\tilde{f}## there should such ##p## that ## \tilde{f}=f(p)##.

Do I use this property of local closedness correctly?
 
Hello! There is a simple line in the textbook. If ##S## is a manifold, an injectively immersed submanifold ##M## of ##S## is embedded if and only if ##M## is locally closed in ##S##. Recall the definition. M is locally closed if for each point ##x\in M## there open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##. Embedding to injective immesion is simple. The opposite direction is hard. Suppose I have ##N## as source manifold and ##f:N\rightarrow S## is the injective...
Back
Top