Inner product of random Gaussian vector

architect
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I would like to ask a question please.

Assume we have a random vector X that is distributed under the Gaussian model and take the inner product of this vector and another constant vector d. Will the source distribution (Gaussian) remain the same? My intuition (although I might be wrong) says yes since the inner product may be regarded as a scaling operation. I know that this is true when we multiply a random variable with a constant, I just wonder if it applies to the inner product as well.

BR,

Alex.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
architect said:
Hi,

I would like to ask a question please.

Assume we have a random vector X that is distributed under the Gaussian model and take the inner product of this vector and another constant vector d. Will the source distribution (Gaussian) remain the same? My intuition (although I might be wrong) says yes since the inner product may be regarded as a scaling operation. I know that this is true when we multiply a random variable with a constant, I just wonder if it applies to the inner product as well.

BR,

Alex.

By definition if a random vector x=x_1+x_2+...+x_n has a multivariate normal distribution, then the inner product y=<a,x>, where a is a constant vector:

y=a_{1}x_{1}+a_{2}x_{2},+...+a_{n}x_{n} is normally distributed.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your help. Appreciated!

BR,

Alex
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top