Inner product of signals (or wavefunction)

wang7022
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Dear All:

Any idea for the following interesting question:

As we know we can calculate inner product of two wave functions A and B
as <A|B>. here both A and B are vector in hilbert space. here we may use
fourier transform to get momentum representation of A and B, and get same
result.

Then let's apply this idea in this way, if we have two real signals, such as X and Y and I want to get their inner product because signals could be consider as vector in hilbert space also. Now I use Fourier transform to get P = fft(X) and Q = fft(Y).
then get their inner product = conj(P)*Q.
now may I condiser this result as an inner product of signal X and Y?

Thanks for comments and I still don't have clear idea in this problem so just let's discuss it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wang7022 said:
As we know we can calculate inner product of two wave functions A and B
as <A|B>. here both A and B are vector in hilbert space. here we may use
fourier transform to get momentum representation of A and B, and get same
result.
Many things are confused here. ##|A \rangle## and ##|B \rangle## are vectors in Hilbert space, indeed, and thus are not wave functions. They become wave functions when projected on position "eigenstates" (*),
$$
\psi_A(x) = \langle x | A \rangle
$$
Likewise, one can obtained momentum-space wave functions,
$$
\phi_A(p) = \langle p | A \rangle
$$

While one can go from ##\psi_A(x)## to ##\phi_A(p)## and vice-versa from Fourier transforms, don't forget that ##\langle A | B \rangle## involves an integral when expressed in term of wave functions:
$$
\langle A | B \rangle = \int \psi_A^*(x) \psi_B(x) \, d x = \int \phi_A^*(p) \phi_B(p) \, d p
$$

wang7022 said:
Then let's apply this idea in this way, if we have two real signals, such as X and Y and I want to get their inner product because signals could be consider as vector in hilbert space also. Now I use Fourier transform to get P = fft(X) and Q = fft(Y).
then get their inner product = conj(P)*Q.
now may I condiser this result as an inner product of signal X and Y?
No.

This does however remind me of the convolution theorem.

(*) I don't want to get into the mathematical weeds here. Look up "rigged Hilbert space" to learn more.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
70
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top