MHB Explaining Integer Equations: Why -1 at the End?

  • Thread starter Thread starter psc109
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concepts Integer
AI Thread Summary
In integer equations that start with 1, the presence of -1 at the end arises from the manipulation of the equation. When the sum is expressed as S = 1 + 2 + 4 + ... + 2^N, subtracting 1 from both sides leads to a new equation where the original "+1" becomes "-1" on the left side. This transformation is essential for deriving the formula S = 2^(N+1) - 1. The -1 reflects the initial "+1" in the sum, which balances the equation after manipulation. Understanding this concept clarifies why the -1 appears in specific cases but not when starting with other integers like -5 or -8.
psc109
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can some one explain to my why an integer equation that starts with 1 has a -1 at the end of the equation.

example:

1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 ... + 2 ^ N = 2 x ( 2 ^ N ) - 1

Conceptually where does the rule come from that there is a minus at the end of the equation.

It starts with an odd number so the answer must be an odd number and that's why -1 is subtracted at the end then how come if an equation started with -5 or -8 you would not subtract the -5 or -8 in the end?

I've seen numerical explanations but they confuse me, can it be explained with words?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Intiger Concepts

psc109 said:
Can some one explain to my why an integer equation that starts with 1 has a -1 at the end of the equation.

example:

1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 ... + 2 ^ N = 2 x ( 2 ^ N ) - 1

Conceptually where does the rule come from that there is a minus at the end of the equation.

It starts with an odd number so the answer must be an odd number and that's why -1 is subtracted at the end then how come if an equation started with -5 or -8 you would not subtract the -5 or -8 in the end?

I've seen numerical explanations but they confuse me, can it be explained with words?

The general formula for a geometric sum is...

$\displaystyle S_{n} = \sum_{k=0}^{n} a^{k} = \frac{1 - a^{n+1}}{1-a}\ (1)$

Setting a=2 You obtain $S_{n} = 2^{\ n+1} - 1$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Re: Intiger Concepts

Thank you Chisigma, the example you gave does not start with one and does not have a negative 1 at the end.

Why is it there in the the example i was given? Why subtract 1 at the end when if say I started it 8 I would not subtract 8 at the end.
 
Re: Intiger Concepts

psc109 said:
Thank you Chisigma, the example you gave does not start with one and does not have a negative 1 at the end.

Why is it there in the the example i was given? Why subtract 1 at the end when if say I started it 8 I would not subtract 8 at the end.

I confess not to understand exactly Your question, expecially the words 'it start with 1 and ends with -1'... ewerywhere in Math we meet expressions like 'a = b' and no general connection exists between the 'head' of a and the 'tail' of b... may be however that my misundestanding depends from my poor knowledege of the english language (Emo)...

Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$
 
One way of looking at it is this: Let S= 1+ 2+ 2^2+ 2^3+ ... 2^n
Subtract 1 from both sides: S- 1= 2+ 2^2+ 2^3+ ...+ 2^n.

The "+1" on the right has become "-1" on left!

Now, factor a "2" on the right: S- 1= 2(1+ 2+ 2^2+ ...+ 2^{n-1})

That "1+ 2+ 2^2+ 2^{n-1} on the right is almost the "1+ 2+ 2^2+ ...+ 2^n" we had before. Make it that way by "adding and subtracting 2^n inside the parentheses:
S-1= 2(1+ 2+ 2^2+ ...+ 2^{n-1}+ 2^n- 2^n)= 2(S- 2^n)
S- 1= 2S- 2^{n+1}

Solve that for S by subtracting 2S from both sides and adding 1 to both sides:
-S= 1- 2^{n+1}

so S= 2^{n+1}- 1

That "-1" at the end is due to the "1" on the left in "S- 1" which is, itself, due to the fact that there was a "+1" on the right in the initial equation.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K
3
Replies
105
Views
6K
Back
Top