What is the concept for solving equations with integer parts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mtayab1994
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation 2*[x] - 3*[3x] + 7 = 0, where [x] represents the integer part of x. Initial attempts to solve the equation by removing brackets led to confusion regarding the validity of potential solutions like x = 1.07. Participants emphasize that the integer part of a number can affect the outcome, particularly noting that [3x] does not equal 3[x]. The conversation highlights the need to analyze the equation within specific intervals defined by integer values, leading to three distinct families of intervals for potential solutions. Ultimately, the conclusion suggests that only the first family of intervals yields valid integer solutions.
mtayab1994
Messages
584
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



2*[x]-3*[3x]+7=0

Homework Equations



solve for x when [x] is the integer part of the number.

The Attempt at a Solution



To solve it i removed the brackets and got x=1 and then i found the integer part of 1 is 1.

Is it correct? If not is there a concept to solving it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What if x = 1.07? Will this be a solution to the equation?
 
what do u mean by what if x=1.07

The integer part of 1.07 is 1 right? so that can be a solution as well and i also thought about have it as x= [1,2[
 
Don't forget that [3x]\ne 3[x]. For example, if 1.5, then [x]= 1 but 3x= 4.5 so [3x]= 4, not 3. With x= 1.5, 2[x]- 3[3x]+ 7= 2(1)- 3(4)+ 7= 2- 12+ 7= -3, not 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yea thanks for the tip but I'm getting no where with this one at all.
 
What are the largest and smallest values of x that will be solutions to the equation? The solution interval is not [1,2], like you said earlier, since, as HallsofIvy showed, 1.5 is not a solution.
 
You need to use general intervals. Remember that:
<br /> [3 x] = N \in \mathbb{Z}, \; N \le 3 x &lt; N + 1 \Leftrightarrow \frac{N}{3} \le x &lt; \frac{N + 1}{3}<br />

So, consider the following 3 families of intervals:
First family:

<br /> N = 3 k, k \le x &lt; k + \frac{1}{3}, \; \mathbb{Z}<br />
Then you have:
<br /> [x] = k, [3 x] = N = 3 k<br />
and your equation reads:
<br /> 2 k - 3 (3 k) + 7 = 0<br />

Second family:
<br /> N = 3 k + 1, k + \frac{1}{3} \le x &lt; k + \frac{2}{3}<br />
Then, you have:
<br /> [x] = k, [3 x] = N = 3 k + 1<br />
and your equation reads:
<br /> 2 k - 3 ( 3 k + 1) + 7 = 0<br />

Third family:
<br /> N = 3 k + 2, k + \frac{2}{3} \le x &lt; k + 1<br />
Then you have:
<br /> [x] = k, [3 x] = N = 3 k + 2<br />
and your equation reads:
<br /> 2 k - 3 (3 k + 2) + 7 = 0<br />

Thus, you get three cases that exhaust the whole set of real numbers and for each case you get an equation. The solution to those equations has to be an integer!
 
Isn't it true that only the first family has a solution?
 
It seems that way, but I wanted the op to check that themselves.
 
Back
Top