MHB Integer-Sided Right Triangle: 2001 Leg Length & Minimum Other Leg Length

lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
The shorter leg of an integer-sided right triangle has length 2001. How short
can the other leg be?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
The shorter leg of an integer-sided right triangle has length 2001. How short can the other leg be?
my solution:
$2001=667\times 3=3\times 23\times 29$
so the other leg =$667\times 4=2668$
 
Last edited:
Thankyou Albert for the correct answer - and for your tireless participation!(Clapping)

Suggested solution:

Let $a,b,c$ be the sides of the triangle. Thus $2001 = a < b < c$. Set $c=b+m$. Then $(b+m)^2 = b^2+2001^2$ or $m(2b+m) = 2001^2$. So $m$ is a divisor of $2001^2=3^2\cdot 667^2$ and since $b= c-m$ is to be shortest ($> 2001$), $m = 667$ (the next largest divisor is $3 \cdot 667 = 2001$, which makes $b=0$) should be considered. Then $667(2b+667) = 9\cdot667^2$ gives $b=2668$ and $c=2668 + 667=3335$. One checks, that $2001^2+2668^2 = 3335^2$.
Comment: This triangle is the $(3,4,5)$ triangle since $(2001,2668,3335) = 667(3,4,5)$. But recognizing this, does not prove, that $2668$ is the shortest possible side larger than $2001$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top