Integer value of the longest possible side of a triangle

AI Thread Summary
To determine the longest possible side of a triangle with a perimeter of 30 cm, the sum of any two sides must be greater than the third side. This means that if the longest side is denoted as 'x', then the other two sides must be less than 15 cm each to satisfy the triangle inequality. Therefore, the maximum integer value for the longest side is 15 cm, as it cannot equal or exceed half the perimeter. This conclusion is based on the fundamental properties of triangle side lengths. Understanding these principles is essential for solving similar geometric problems.
aprao
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hai

COuld you please help the formula as I am not able to identify the question below:

Question:

For a Traingle with a perimeter of 30cm, what is the integer value of the longest possible side ?

REgards
aprao
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The sum of any two sides of a triangle is always greater than the third side. This puts a limit on the length of the biggest side.
Use this fact.




spacetime
www.geocities.com/physics_all/
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top