Integral equation with bounded unknown kernel

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
JohnXYZ
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I need to solve an integral equation of the form

$$\forall \omega \in [0,1], ~ \int_{\mathbb{R}} K(\omega,y)f(y)dy = \omega$$

where

- f is known and positive with $$\int_{\mathbb{R}} f(y)dy = 1$$

- K: [0,1] x R -> [0,1] is the unknown kernel

I am looking for a solution other than K(omega,y) = omega. I do not know if such a solution exists, so I am looking either for a solution, or for a proof that K(omega,y) = \omega is the only solution.

----------------------

Let me tell you more about my attempts :

- looking for K(omega,y) = a(omega)b(y) fails because it leads to a(omega) = \omega and b(y) = 1

- looking for K(omega,y) = a(omega-y) and trying to solve the convolution equation $$\forall \omega \in [0,1], ~ (a \star f)(\omega) = \omega$$ fails (I proved it with Fourier transforms, although I'm not 100% confident about my proof)

- setting K(omega,y) = omega + H(omega,y) and trying to solve $$\int_{\mathbb{R}} H(\omega,y) f(y) = 0$$ with either H(omega,y) = a(omega)b(y) or H(omega,y) = a(y-omega) fails as well

There may not be a solution but I hope you can help me find one or prove that it's impossible ! Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One way of thinking about it is to assume we can differentiate inside the integral sign with respect to [itex]\omega[/itex]

[tex]\int_{\mathbb{R}} K'(\omega,y)f(y)dy = 1[/tex]
[tex]\int_{\mathbb{R}} K"(\omega,y)f(y)dy = 0[/tex]

We can consider [itex]K"[/itex] to be a member of a family of functions of [itex]y[/itex] parameterized by [itex]\omega[/itex] such that each member of the family is orthogonal to [itex]f(y)[/itex] on [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex].

Suppose we have an orthogonal basis [itex]\{f_1(y), f_2(y),f_3(y)...\}[/itex] for some space of functions and that [itex]f = f_1[/itex] Then [itex]\omega f_2 + (1 - \omega) f_3[/itex] is a family of functions that is orthogonal to [itex]f[/itex].

I'm just making these suggestion off the top of my head. I haven't tried to work this out with any concrete example.
 
Thank you for your answer, I will also try your approach. Working from K'' may still be difficult since we have a boundedness condition on K.