fred2028
- 19
- 0
This is me questioning a concept, so I did not follow the template.
I know that
\[\int {u(t-a)dt = tu(t-a)} \]
where u(t) is the unit step function. Does this mean that any arbitrary function multiplied by u(t) is just the integral of that function multiplied by u(t), and I don't have to do integration by parts? For example,
\[\int {u(t-a)\cos tdt = u(t-a)\int {\cos tdt} } \]
and not
\[\int {u(t-a)\cos tdt = u(t-a)\sin t - \int {tu(t-a)\cos tdt} } \]
?
And my 2nd question is how in the world do you solve
\[\int {u( - t + a)dt} \]
and how would you graph this?
Nextly, I assume that
\[f(t)u(t - a)u(t - b) = f(t),t \geqslant a\]
if a > b. Basically, the function only "turns on" when both unit steps are 1. Is this true? If so, would the following equal 0 since the 2 unit step functions do not overlap?
\[f(t)u(t - 1)u(t + 1)\]
I know that
\[\int {u(t-a)dt = tu(t-a)} \]
where u(t) is the unit step function. Does this mean that any arbitrary function multiplied by u(t) is just the integral of that function multiplied by u(t), and I don't have to do integration by parts? For example,
\[\int {u(t-a)\cos tdt = u(t-a)\int {\cos tdt} } \]
and not
\[\int {u(t-a)\cos tdt = u(t-a)\sin t - \int {tu(t-a)\cos tdt} } \]
?
And my 2nd question is how in the world do you solve
\[\int {u( - t + a)dt} \]
and how would you graph this?
Nextly, I assume that
\[f(t)u(t - a)u(t - b) = f(t),t \geqslant a\]
if a > b. Basically, the function only "turns on" when both unit steps are 1. Is this true? If so, would the following equal 0 since the 2 unit step functions do not overlap?
\[f(t)u(t - 1)u(t + 1)\]