How Do You Integrate ∫arcsin(2x²)dx Correctly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kiwiro0ls
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral ∫arcsin(2x²)dx presents significant challenges, particularly when using integration by parts. The initial approach involved setting u=arcsin(2x²) and v=x, leading to the integral becoming ∫[x/sqrt(1-4x⁴)dx, which is difficult to solve. Participants in the discussion noted that the solution likely involves elliptic integrals, as confirmed by Wolfram Alpha, and there is speculation that the original problem may contain a typographical error.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration techniques, specifically integration by parts.
  • Familiarity with inverse trigonometric functions, particularly arcsin and arccos.
  • Knowledge of trigonometric substitution methods.
  • Basic comprehension of elliptic integrals and their applications.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of integration by parts in depth, focusing on its applications in complex integrals.
  • Explore trigonometric substitution techniques for integrals involving square roots.
  • Research elliptic integrals and their properties to understand their role in advanced calculus.
  • Examine common typographical errors in calculus problems and their impact on problem-solving.
USEFUL FOR

Students in calculus courses, particularly those studying integration techniques, educators preparing exam questions, and anyone interested in advanced mathematical problem-solving involving elliptic functions.

Kiwiro0ls
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Just got out of a Calculus 2/ Lineal Algebra exam and I am still wondering about the first question:
∫arcsin(2×2)dx

I used integration by parts letting u=arcsin(2×2) and so du=dx/sqrt[1-4x4], v=x

=xarcsin(2×2) - ∫[x/sqrt[1-4x4]dx

this second integral is what I can´t solve.

I tried doing trigonometric substitution where sin∅=2x2, and then later used a trig identity to integrate... but I really think I messed up somewhere.

If anyone out there has any clue, its much appreciated! :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the second integral WERE ∫[x/sqrt[1-4x^4]dx, you could just substitute w=x^2 which would then give you arcsin again.
However, du=dx 4x/sqrt[1-4x4] (chain rule) so that the integral you actually have to solve becomes ∫[4x^2/sqrt[1-4x^4]dx which, according to wolfram alpha has a complicated solution involving elliptic integrals.
Maybe you are missing a factor in the question?
 
No I am very very very sure this is the question,
there's some talk amongst the class that it was typed wrong or something, apparently no one got those 15pts...
anyway, I am still out of ideas and trying at it!
 
Kiwiro0ls said:
Just got out of a Calculus 2/ Lineal Algebra exam and I am still wondering about the first question:
∫arcsin(2×2)dx

I used integration by parts letting u=arcsin(2×2) and so du=dx/sqrt[1-4x4], v=x

=xarcsin(2×2) - ∫[x/sqrt[1-4x4]dx

this second integral is what I can´t solve.

I tried doing trigonometric substitution where sin∅=2x2, and then later used a trig identity to integrate... but I really think I messed up somewhere.

If anyone out there has any clue, its much appreciated! :)
Are you sure it wasn't something like \displaystyle \int x\ \arcsin(2x^2)\,dx\ ?
 
Nope D: I am 100% sure it was ∫arcsin (2x^2)dx
 
Kiwiro0ls said:
Nope D: I am 100% sure it was ∫arcsin (2x^2)dx

Err I'm surprised a question like that would show up, but you can use the fact that :

\int_{}^{}arcsin(2x^2)dx = \int_{}^{}\frac{\pi}{2} - arccosxdx = \frac{\pi}{2}x - xarccosx + \sqrt{1-x^2} + c
 
Zondrina said:
Err I'm surprised a question like that would show up, but you can use the fact that :

\int_{}^{}arcsin(2x^2)dx = \int_{}^{}\frac{\pi}{2} - arccosxdx = \frac{\pi}{2}x - xarccosx + \sqrt{1-x^2} + c

Wouldn't it be ##\int \arcsin(2x^2)\, dx = \int\frac \pi 2 -\arccos(2x^2)\, dx##?
 
So
=xarcsin(2x2)-4∫[x2dx/sqrt(1-4x4)]
and that's what I am trying to solve
 
Looks like a valid problem for trigonometric substitution, particularly the 1/sqrt(...).
 
  • #10
Beats me why this thread is still alive. As has already been pointed out, the solution involves elliptic functions and no "standard" calculus technique is going to work it. It is pretty obvious that if that was intended, the problem has a typo.
 
  • #11
oh well :´(
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K