Integral representation of incomplete gamma function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral representation of the incomplete gamma function in terms of the Bessel function. Participants explore methods to verify this representation and consider various approaches to manipulate the integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the integral representation of the incomplete gamma function involving the Bessel function and seeks assistance in verifying it.
  • Another participant questions the correctness of the formula and asks for its source, providing a link to related formulas.
  • A third participant confirms the formula's correctness but notes its lack of fame.
  • One participant suggests starting with an integral representation of the Bessel function and switching the order of integration, indicating that multiple approaches may be necessary.
  • This participant references a specific equation from an online resource related to the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the formula's recognition or the best approach to verify it, indicating that multiple competing views remain regarding the methods to explore.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the formula's familiarity and correctness, and the discussion includes references to external resources for further exploration.

patric44
Messages
308
Reaction score
40
TL;DR
verifying the integral representation of incomplete gamma function
hi guys
I was trying to verify the integral representation of incomplete gamma function in terms of Bessel function, which is represented by
$$\gamma(a,x) = x^{\frac{a}{2}}\;\int_{0}^{∞}e^{-t}t^{\frac{a}{2}-1}J_{a}(2\sqrt{xt})dt\;\;a>0$$
i was thinking about taking substitutions in order to reach the generating function of Bessel, but it took me nowhere.
i will appreciate any help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
the formula is correct but I guess it is not that famous
 
I would be tempted to start with an integral representation of the Bessel function then switch the order of integration. You might need to try several different ones. It might not lead anywhere, but might be worth a try. My go-to online resource for formulas
https://dlmf.nist.gov

your formula is Equation 8.6.2
https://dlmf.nist.gov/8.6

jason
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K