Integral Using Residue Theorem?

yeahhyeahyeah
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



the integral of 1/(1+x^4) from -infinity to +infinity


Homework Equations




Residue theorem.

The Attempt at a Solution



1/(1+z^4) so z^4 = -1

I know I should be using the residues at z = -sqrt(i) and z= i*sqrt(i)

I am getting a complex number as an answer which makes no sense

residue at z = -sqrt(i) = 1/(4*i*sqrt(i))
and at z = i*sqrt(i) = 1/(4*sqrt(i))

and therefore integral of (1/1+z^4) = 2pi*i* sum of those residues


Am I on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a tricky. When else does z^4+1 =0? Maybe at z=e^{i\frac{\pi}{4}}.
Can you get it from here?
 
Last edited:
been a while since I've done these, but as a start, rather than working with sqrt i, which i don't think is unique, I would find the singularities by first letting
z = r e^{j \theta}

whilst for some integer n
-1 = e^{j\pi(2n+1)}

then the singularities can be found by
z^4 = r^4 e^{j 4 \theta} = e^{j\pi(2n+1)}

giving
\theta = \frac{\pi(2n+1)}{4} = \pi(n/2+1/4)

which I think will give 4 unique singularities for n = 0, 1, 2, 3
 
OOOh, I see, I used the singularities and I get pi/sqrt2 which I think is right. Thank you guys so much. I actually have another related question now though. First of all, why does sqrt(i) not work when I use it as z?

Also,

I'm now trying to do:

integral (0 to infinity) of sin(x^2) using residue theorem as well. I can't figure out how to make the substitution.


I don't know when/if you guys will answer that question but thanks so much for your help just now!
 
well first you didn't find all the singularities (2 out of 4) & sqrt(i) is not unique. There are 2 unique answers, note we try and solve
z^2 = i

so as before
(e^{i \theta})^2 = e^{i 2 \theta} = e^{(2n+1)\pi}

so the 2 solutions in the \theta range [0, 2pi) are
\theta = (n+1/2)\pi} = \pi/2, 3\pi/2

compare it with solving
z^2 = 1
there is a plus & minus solution

that said if i remember residues correctly, you probably only need 2 of them anyway

not too sure about your sin question, but it may be worth trying writing the sin in terms of the sum/differnce of 2 complex exponentials
 
lanedance said:
been a while since I've done these, but as a start, rather than working with sqrt i, which i don't think is unique, I would find the singularities by first letting
z = r e^{j \theta}

whilst for some integer n
-1 = e^{j\pi(2n+1)}

then the singularities can be found by
z^4 = r^4 e^{j 4 \theta} = e^{j\pi(2n+1)}

giving
\theta = \frac{\pi(2n+1)}{4} = \pi(n/2+1/4)

which I think will give 4 unique singularities for n = 0, 1, 2, 3
I agree. Except when you make the semicircle, the poles n=0, 1 are the only ones on the upper half plane.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top