Integrals of isotropic tensors, for expansion over spherical harmonics

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the expansion of a density function ##\rho(t,\mathbf{x})## in terms of isotropic tensors and their integrals over spherical harmonics. The participants are exploring the properties of these integrals, particularly focusing on the cases of different tensor ranks and the implications of symmetry and isotropy in the context of the integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to compute integrals of isotropic tensors and questions the assumptions regarding the coefficients in the expansion. They explore the implications of symmetry and the effects of rotations on the integrals.
  • Some participants question the behavior of the integrand under inversion and its impact on the integral's value, particularly for odd and even cases.
  • Others suggest considering the isotropic nature of the angular integral and its relation to Kronecker deltas in higher-order cases.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising questions about the treatment of different tensor ranks and the implications of symmetry. Some guidance has been offered regarding the isotropic nature of the integrals and the use of Kronecker deltas, but no consensus has been reached on specific cases.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of symmetry and isotropy, questioning how these properties affect the evaluation of integrals over spherical harmonics. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by higher-order tensors and the need for careful consideration of their properties.

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
Homework Statement
See below
Relevant Equations
See below
Consider an expansion for the density ##\rho(t,\mathbf{x})## of the form$$\rho(t,\mathbf{x}) = \sum_{l=0}^{\infty} a_{i_1 i_2 \dots i_{\mathscr{l}}}(t,r) \hat{x}_{i_1} \hat{x}_{i_2} \dots \hat{x}_{i_{\mathscr{l}}}$$where ##r = |\mathbf{x}|## and ##\hat{x}_i = x_i/r##. Also, ##a_{i_1 i_2 \dots i_{\mathscr{l}}}(t,r)## is totally symmetric and traceless on any pair of indices. We would like to compute\begin{align*}
I_{ij}(t) &= \int d^3 x \ \rho(t,\mathbf{x}) x_i x_j \\
&= \sum_{l=0} \int d^3 x \ a_{i_1 i_2 \dots i_{\mathscr{l}}}(t,r) \hat{x}_{i_1} \hat{x}_{i_2} \dots \hat{x}_{i_l} \ x_i x_j
\end{align*}For ##l=0##, I assume that we can take the coefficient to be unity (I could be wrong about this too...). In this case the contribution to the sum (which I'll denote by ##I^{(0)}##) will be:$$I^{(0)}_{ij} = \int d^3 x \ x_i x_j$$and by considering the effect of rotations, I can figure out that:$${\tilde{I}^{(0)}_{ij}} = R_{ip} R_{jq} I^{(0)}_{pq} = \int d^3 x \ x_{i}' x_{j}' = I^{(0)}_{ij}$$therefore ##I^{(0)}_{ij} = \alpha \delta_{ij}## for some constant ##\alpha##. From this you easily find ##\alpha## by taking the trace, i.e. ##I^{(0)} = \int d^3 x \ r^2 = 3\alpha##.

Now the more tricky (?) case of the higher poles. Say ##l=1##, for example:$$I^{(1)}_{ij} = \int d^3 x \ \frac{a_k}{r} x_k \ x_i x_j $$In this case, I'm not sure if the answer is also ##\propto \delta_{ij}##? I don't think so, because I expect the ##x_k## needs to be rotated as well. However, obviously ##k## does not appear in the index structure of ##I##. How do I treat these cases?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What happens with the integrand if you let ##x_i \to -x_i##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ergospherical
That makes sense - if you have an odd number of x’s, then under inversion the integral flips sign. But since the integral is extended over all space, it must be the same as before, so zero.

What about all the even cases, e.g. ##I^{(2)}##?
 
Use that the result of the angular integral must be isotropic. An isotropic tensor of rank 2n can be written as a multiple of the fully symmetrized products of n Kronecker deltas.

Edit: I think I spoke a bit fast there. Of course, with the Kronecker delta being isotropic, so will any product of Kronecker deltas, but the argumentation remains the same.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ergospherical

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K