Integrating cos^2x with the Chain Rule: Explanation and Example

  • Thread starter Thread starter johann1301
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dx Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the function ∫cos(2x) dx, specifically exploring the use of the chain rule in the context of integration. Participants are examining the relationship between differentiation and integration, particularly how the chain rule applies or does not apply in this scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the validity of using the chain rule for integration, with some attempting to apply it by making substitutions. Others are clarifying the distinction between differentiation and integration, particularly in the context of reversing the chain rule.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the misconceptions surrounding the application of the chain rule in integration. There is a mix of attempts to apply substitution and clarifications regarding the correct approach to integration, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of considering the variable of integration when making substitutions, and there are references to integration by parts as an alternative method. The original poster's understanding of the relationship between integration and differentiation is being critically examined.

johann1301
Messages
216
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


∫cos2x dx

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the answer, and i know how to get there using:

cos2x+sin2x=1
cos2x-sin2x=cos2x
cos2x=(1+cos2x)/2

But why can't i use the chain rule? Can i?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am puzzled by your question. The chain rule is a method for differentiation. Why would you expect to be able to use it to integrate?

Integration is the opposite of differentiation. Perhaps you are asking "why can't I reverse the chain rule to integrate this?".

The chain rule says that if x is a function of some variable, t, and y is a function of x, then dy/dt= (dy/dx)(dx/dt). To use it we have to multiply by dx/dt. To do that in reverse, which is "substitution", the "dx/dt" term has to already be in the integral, you can't just insert it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Why would you expect to be able to use it to integrate?

u=cosx

therefore...

∫(cos2x)dx = ∫(u2)dx = (1/3)u3/u' + C = (1/3)cosx3/(cosx)' + C = (1/3)cosx3/(-sinx) + C

chain rule reversed?
 
Your second equality, \int u^2 dx= (1/3)u^3/u'+ C is incorrect for precisely the reasons I explained in my first response.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
johann1301 said:
u=cosx

therefore...

∫(cos2x)dx = ∫(u2)dx = (1/3)u3/u' + C = (1/3)cosx3/(cosx)' + C = (1/3)cosx3/(-sinx) + C

chain rule reversed?

You must also consider the variable of integration. Since you've made a substitution u, you want to integrate with respect to u, and as HallsofIvy said, this is moot because of the chain rule.

Ever heard of integration by parts? You should rather think of this as a product, \int\cos{(x)}\cos{(x)}dx. Try integrating this

(fg)' = f'g+ g'f
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K