Integrating Equations with Exponents: A Challenge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on integrating equations involving exponents, specifically using the substitution method with the equation u = 1 + tan(t) and its derivative du = sec^2(t) dt. The challenge arises from managing the exponent during integration, particularly when applying the chain rule in reverse. The solution involves substituting u for (1 + tan(t)) and adjusting the limits of integration, simplifying the integral to u^3 from 1 to 2, effectively eliminating the sec^2(t) term.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration techniques, specifically substitution.
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, particularly tangent and secant.
  • Knowledge of the chain rule in calculus.
  • Basic skills in evaluating definite integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Practice integration by substitution with various functions.
  • Explore the properties of trigonometric integrals, focusing on secant and tangent.
  • Learn about the chain rule in calculus and its application in integration.
  • Study definite integrals and how to change limits of integration during substitution.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those tackling integration techniques, and educators looking for examples of substitution in trigonometric integrals.

Shambles
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


nzey38.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Homework Statement





Homework Equations


u = 1+tant
du = sec^2(t) dt
dt = du / sec^2(t)

The Attempt at a Solution



It seems like I should be using substitution in the equation, however the exponent is messing things up for me. I recall from derivatives how they interact with the chain rule, but am not sure how this would work backwards in integration. Something like,

I(u^3)(sec^2(t)) = (u^4/4)((sec^2(t)) (tan(t))

Except I haven't gotten rid of the t variable and now have t and u. Any points are welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you just substitute u for (1 + tan t) and du for sec^2(t) dt (and take care of the limits of integration, of course)?
 
Ah I see how when I change the limits of integration it removes the nasty sec^2(t) so all I'm left with is the integral of u^3 with u going from 1 to 2. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K