I Integrating Sin(x): Solve the Area of a Half Circle

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Karim Habashy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
AI Thread Summary
The integration of sin(x) from 0 to π equals 2, which is a common calculus result. However, the discussion clarifies that interpreting this integral as the area of a half circle of radius one leads to confusion. The error lies in misidentifying the variable x as a coordinate rather than the angle subtended. The correct approach involves integrating (sin(x))^2, which accurately represents the area of the half circle, yielding π/2. This highlights the importance of understanding the geometric interpretation of integrals in calculus.
Karim Habashy
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
Hi All,

This is a very elementary question but, from calculus :

∫sinx dx from 0 to pi = 2, but i thought of it, in terms of the attached driagram.
upload_2016-3-5_19-42-31.png


And if we think of it, this way, the integration is the area of a half circle of radius one and is equal to Pi/2.

Where did i go wrong ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Karim Habashy said:
And if we think of it, this way, the integration is the area of a half circle of radius one and is equal to Pi/2.
No, it's not. Your mistake was to assume ##x## as the coordinate in the horizontal line, when it's actually the angle subtended between the line and the horizontal axis.
 
You are right, thanks. the integration would be ∫(sinx)2 dx which is Pi/2.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top