Integrating with Respect to Z: Multivariable Calculus HW Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rozenwyn
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a multivariable calculus problem involving integration with respect to z, specifically focusing on the volume under a surface defined by a cone and a plane. Participants are exploring the setup of the integral and the geometric interpretation of the region involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration limits and the relationship between the cone and the plane. There are attempts to express the intersection of these surfaces in terms of x and y, leading to the formulation of an ellipse in the xy-plane. Some participants question the correctness of their variable substitutions and the implications for the integral setup.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing suggestions for variable transformations and questioning the accuracy of their algebraic manipulations. There is a recognition of the need to consider the Jacobian determinant when changing variables, indicating a productive direction in the exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. The complexity of the geometric relationships involved is also a point of discussion.

Rozenwyn
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I got stuck on the 3rd question and now I kinda don't know what to do. Can someone help me a bit ?

http://img79.imageshack.us/img79/1786/scan5eq3.png

I drew a graph and shaded the region W.

http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/8185/q3qw2.jpg

I thought it would be a good idea to integrate with respect to Z first. So I got:

[tex]V = \int \ \int \ \int_{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}^{\frac{4-x-y}{2}} \,dz[/tex]

Then I got stuck.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Solve for the curve where the plane intersects the cone in terms of x and y and you'll get the equation of the ellipse in the xy plane that bounds the "shadow" of the shape. Let the integral over x and y go over the interior of this ellipse.
 
That's what I have been trying to do but setting
[tex]\frac{4-x-y}{2} = \sqrt{x^2+y^2}[/tex] leads me to a dead end.

I get
[tex]4-x-y-x+\frac{x^2}{4} + \frac{xy}{4} -y+\frac{xy}{4}+\frac{y^2}{4} = x^2 + y^2[/tex]

[tex]4-2x-2y-2xy = \frac{3}{4}x^2 + \frac{3}{4}y^2[/tex] ?
 
Last edited:
Try defining new variables u=x+y and v=x-y, which are rotated at 45 degrees to x and y, so that the u and v axes lie along the principal axes of the ellipse.
 
I don't see how it helps since I can't define [tex]\sqrt{x^2+y^2}[/tex] in terms of u or v ?
 
Why not? Solve for x and y in terms of u and v.
 
Ok so this is what I did.
x = (u+v)/2 & y = (u-v)/2

[tex]\frac{4-u}{2} = \sqrt{ \left( \frac{u+v}{2} \right)^2+ \left( \frac{u-v}{2} \right)^2}[/tex]

Am I on the right path ?

*edit, yeah u're right. fixed now.
 
Last edited:
If you used my definition of u and v, you didn't solve for x and y correctly. There shouldn't be a factor of 1/2 on one and not the other.
 
So from this I get:
[tex]\frac{16-8u+u^2}{4} = \frac{2u^2+2v^2}{4}[/tex]

[tex]16-8u+u^2=2u^2+2v^2[/tex]

If I go further:

[tex]16 = u^2+8u+v^2[/tex]

[tex]16 + 16 = u^2+8u+16+v^2[/tex]

[tex]32 = (u+4)^2 + v^2[/tex]

[tex]\frac{(u+4)^2}{32} + \frac{v^2}{16} = 1[/tex]

Now this is an equation of an ellipse but it is not centered along the z axis. Did I do something wrong ?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
That looks right. There's no reason to expect the ellipse to be centered at the z-axis. Imagine the plane was at a much steeper angle, then the ellipse would have one end close to the z-axis and one far away.
 
  • #11
So can I set up the integral this way ?

[tex]\int_{-4\sqrt{2}}^{4\sqrt{2}} \ \int_{-\sqrt{16- \frac{(u+4)^2}{2}}}^{\sqrt{16- \frac{(u+4)^2}{2}}} \ \int_{\sqrt{ \left( \frac{u+v}{2} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{u-v}{2} \right)^2}}^{\frac{4-u}{2}} \,dz\,dv\,du[/tex]

P.S. Plz let this be right. Editing the code for this is a *****. ! :p
 
Last edited:
  • #12
I'm not going to check all your algebra, but that looks like the right idea. Just one more thing: when you change variables from x,y to u,v you need to remember that dxdy is not just replaced by dudv, there is an extra factor. This is the jacobian determinant, or if you're not familar with this, you can derive it geometrically by seeing the area of the parellelogram in u,v space corresponding to the tiny rectangle dx by dy.
 
  • #13
Thank you for your help. I should be fine after this.:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K