Integration by filaments or integration by strate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amaelle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around integration techniques in calculus, specifically comparing "integration by filaments" and "integration by strate," which appears to refer to a method involving disks or rings. Participants explore the validity of switching between these methods and the conditions under which such a switch may not be feasible.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the integration by strate method and questions its correctness. Some participants seek clarification on the term and its relation to known methods, while others discuss the necessity of splitting integrals based on the geometry of the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying concepts and exploring different integration methods. There is an exchange of insights regarding the setup of integrals and the reasoning behind splitting them into different ranges, indicating a productive dialogue without a clear consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific integral limits and the presence of different integrands based on the geometric configuration, suggesting that the problem involves complex volume calculations. The discussion also hints at potential constraints related to the methods being compared.

Amaelle
Messages
309
Reaction score
54
Homework Statement
look at the image
Relevant Equations
cylindrical coordinates
integration by strates
integration by filaments
Greetings
While solving the following exercice, ( the method used is the integration by filaments and I have no problem doing it this way)
1622996959713.png

here is the solution
1622997058481.png

1622997162664.png

My question is the following:
I want to do the integration by strate and here is my proposition
1622997349308.png

is that even correct?
I would like to know if there is cases when switching between the two methods of integration is not possible?
thank you in advance!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
I've never heard of "integration by strate." Could you explain what this means?
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and Amaelle
Certainly look at the image
1623001742727.png
it means doing the integration by rings and then integrating by height
 
Oh, okay. In the US, I think that technique is referred to as the disc method.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
You should be able to use that method, but you're going to have to break the integral up into two integrals, one from ##x=-2## to ##x=-\sqrt{2}## and one from ##x=-\sqrt{2}## to ##x=-1##.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and BvU
thank you very much , indeed I used your insights to solve the question under the disk method
1623071002384.png

but the only way I could find out was to
1623071123825.png


and then substructing the sphere from the paraboloid
I would be very grateful if you could elaborate more about the setting of your method and why you need to split the integration this way?
thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
To keep it simple, I'm going to consider volume integrals but the same ideas apply to your problem.

When you do the integrals over ##r## and ##\theta##, you end up with an integral of the form
$$\int_{x_1}^{x_2} \pi r^2 \,dx$$ where we can identify ##\pi r^2## as the area of the disk and ##dV = \pi r^2\,dx## as the volume of the infinitesimal slice. In this particular problem, from ##x=-2## to ##x=-\sqrt{2}##, the volume is given by an integral of that form. However, from ##x=-\sqrt{2}## to ##x=-1##, you have a disk with a hole in the middle with area ##\pi(r_{\rm outer}^2-r_{\rm inner}^2)##. Hence, the volume of that portion is given by
$$\int_{x_1}^{x_2} \pi (r_{\rm outer}^2-r_{\rm inner}^2) \,dx.$$ Because you have two different integrands, you need to do the integrals for each range separately.

Note that you can manipulate your integrals similarly:
\begin{align*}
I &= \int_{-2}^{-1} \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^{\sqrt{2-x^2}} xr\,dr\,d\theta\,dx
-\int_{-\sqrt 2}^{-1} \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^{\sqrt{x+2}} xr\,dr\,d\theta\,dx \\
&= \int_{-2}^{-\sqrt{2}} \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^{\sqrt{2-x^2}} xr\,dr\,d\theta\,dx
+\int_{-\sqrt{2}}^{-1} \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^{\sqrt{2-x^2}} xr\,dr\,d\theta\,dx
-\int_{-\sqrt 2}^{-1} \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^{\sqrt{x+2}} xr\,dr\,d\theta\,dx \\
&= \int_{-2}^{-\sqrt{2}} \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^{\sqrt{2-x^2}} xr\,dr\,d\theta\,dx
+\int_{-\sqrt{2}}^{-1} \int_0^{2\pi} \int_{\sqrt{x+2}}^{\sqrt{2-x^2}} xr\,dr\,d\theta\,dx
\end{align*} The limits on the ##r## integral are different for ##x=-2## to ##x=-\sqrt{2}## and for ##x=-\sqrt{2}## to ##x=-1##.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Amaelle
thanks a million!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K