Integration by partial fractions with limits

Click For Summary
The integral discussed is ∫(x + 1)/(x² - 3x - 5)dx with limits from 3 to 5. The correct way to express this in LaTeX is ∫₃⁵ (x + 1)/(x² - 3x - 5)dx. It's important to use parentheses correctly to avoid misinterpretation of the integrand. While partial fractions can be used, they may complicate the solution due to the nature of the denominator's factors. Ultimately, the limits of integration are applied after finding the antiderivative.
anthonyk2013
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
\int (x+1/x2-3x-5)dx

I can't put the limits on the integral sign, 5 is the top limit and 3 is the bottom limit.

I can solve using partial fractions ok but I have never solved with limits before.

Where do the limits come in, do I need them at the start or can I factorise as usual and use the limits later in the solution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anthonyk2013 said:
\int (x+1/x2-3x-5)dx

I can't put the limits on the integral sign, 5 is the top limit and 3 is the bottom limit.

I can solve using partial fractions ok but I have never solved with limits before.

Where do the limits come in, do I need them at the start or can I factorise as usual and use the limits later in the solution?

You have used parentheses, but they're not where they need to be. When a numerator or denominator consists of multiple terms, put parentheses around the entire numerator and/or the entire denominator. I gather that the integrand is (x + 1)/(x2 - 3x - 5). As you wrote the integrand, it would be the same as x + (1/x2) - 3x - 5, which isn't what you intended.

To write the integral with limits in LaTeX, you can do it like this:
Code:
$$ \int_3^5 \frac{x + 1}{x^2 - 3x - 5}dx$$

I prefer to use $$ instead of [ tex ]. For inline LaTeX, you can use ## instead of [ itex ].

To answer your question, all you're doing when you use partial fractions is rewriting the integrand in a more convenient form. You bring the limits of integration along until you actually get the antiderivative.

For this problem, I probably wouldn't use partial fractions, since the denominator isn't going to factor into nice linear factors with integer coefficients. I'm not saying it won't work, but it will be a little messy.
 
Mark44 said:
You have used parentheses, but they're not where they need to be. When a numerator or denominator consists of multiple terms, put parentheses around the entire numerator and/or the entire denominator. I gather that the integrand is (x + 1)/(x2 - 3x - 5). As you wrote the integrand, it would be the same as x + (1/x2) - 3x - 5, which isn't what you intended.

To write the integral with limits in LaTeX, you can do it like this:
Code:
$$ \int_3^5 \frac{x + 1}{x^2 - 3x - 5}dx$$

I prefer to use $$ instead of [ tex ]. For inline LaTeX, you can use ## instead of [ itex ].

To answer your question, all you're doing when you use partial fractions is rewriting the integrand in a more convenient form. You bring the limits of integration along until you actually get the antiderivative.

For this problem, I probably wouldn't use partial fractions, since the denominator isn't going to factor into nice linear factors with integer coefficients. I'm not saying it won't work, but it will be a little messy.

Thanks
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
988
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K