Integration - Projectile Motion w/ Air Resistance

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the integration of projectile motion equations with air resistance, specifically addressing the equation of motion along the x-axis, represented as dvx/dt = -g(vx/vt). The user expresses confusion regarding the derivation of equation 178 from FitzPatrick's online notes for classical mechanics. The concept of separation of variables is highlighted as a key method for solving differential equations, emphasizing the importance of the chain rule in treating derivatives as fractions of differentials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in calculus
  • Knowledge of projectile motion principles
  • Basic concepts of air resistance in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of separation of variables in differential equations
  • Review the chain rule and its applications in calculus
  • Explore FitzPatrick's online notes for classical mechanics in detail
  • Learn about the effects of air resistance on projectile motion
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics and mathematics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics and differential equations.

crastinus
Messages
78
Reaction score
9
I"ve seen several texts that say something like this:

Our equation of motion along x is
dvx/dt = -g(vx/vt)

Integrating this, we obtain equation 178 at this link (pretty near the top; sorry, but I can't figure out how to put the equation here). It's from FitzPatrick's online notes for classical mechanics.

I don't see how he gets to 178.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Realize that ##\frac{dv}{dt} = av## can be rewritten as ##\frac{dv}{v} = adt##.
 
I'd learned that we shouldn't think of dx/dt as a quotient at all, and so we can't multiply both sides by dt.

I have seen enough to know that that's wrong, but I don't really understand why. Is this something to do with differentials?

Thanks for the help!
 
That's how you solve differential equations...
 
crastinus said:
I'd learned that we shouldn't think of dx/dt as a quotient at all, and so we can't multiply both sides by dt.

I have seen enough to know that that's wrong, but I don't really understand why. Is this something to do with differentials?

Thanks for the help!
This is called separation of variables and its justification comes from the chain rule. It shows that in some cases you can treat a derivative as 'merely' a fraction of differentials.
 
crastinus said:
I'd learned that we shouldn't think of dx/dt as a quotient at all, and so we can't multiply both sides by dt.

I have seen enough to know that that's wrong, but I don't really understand why. Is this something to do with differentials?

Thanks for the help!

Try:

http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcI/Differentials.aspx
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K