Intensity & Amplitude of Gaussian Beam

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The relationship between intensity and amplitude for a Gaussian beam is defined by the equation I = ½ c εo Eo², where Eo represents the amplitude of the electric field. The intensity distribution in two dimensions is given by I(x,y) = [I0/(σxσy2π)] exp[-x²/(2σx²) - y²/(2σy²)], with I0 as the total intensity and σx, σy as the rms widths. The Poynting vector, which represents power density, is expressed as P(x,y) = E(x,y) x H(x,y) watts/m², where E(x,y) is the electric field and H(x,y) is the magnetic field. The power density can be calculated using w(x,y) = E²(x,y)/(2·Z0) watts/m², where Z0 is the impedance of free space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gaussian beam theory
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic wave equations
  • Knowledge of Poynting vector and power density calculations
  • Proficiency in SI units and their application in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Gaussian beam intensity distribution
  • Learn about the implications of the Poynting vector in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the differences between SI and Gaussian-cgs units in electromagnetic contexts
  • Investigate the application of Gaussian beams in laser technology
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, optical engineers, and anyone involved in the study or application of laser technology and electromagnetic wave propagation.

russel.arnold
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Can tell me the exact relationship between the intensity and the amplitude for a gaussian beam
?
I know that I is proportional to |A|2 .. but i want the value of this proportianality constant
 
Science news on Phys.org
It's more properly called the irradiance (assuming you want the power per unit area), and for any electromagnetic wave (not just Gaussian beams) the relation is
I = ½ c εo Eo2
where Eo is the amplitude of the electric field.
 
I(x) = [I0/σ(2π)0.5] exp[-x2/(2σ2)]

where ∫I(x) dx = I0 and σ is the rms width.

Bob S
 
Last edited:
In engineering units you drop the "c" In the above intensity equation and you'll have Watts.
 
Bob S said:
I(x) = [I0/σ(2π)0.5] exp[-x2/(2σ2)]

where ∫I(x) dx = I0 and σ is the rms width.

Bob S
But that isn't in terms of the amplitude, as requested by the OP. You're also assuming the beam is Gaussian in just 1 transverse dimension. If the beam has a circularly symmetric intensity profile, things are different.

Antiphon said:
In engineering units you drop the "c" In the above intensity equation and you'll have Watts.
Actually, dropping the c gives the energy density in J/m3.
I'm using SI units. I'm not aware of any official "engineering units", unless you also mean the SI system?
 
Redbelly98 said:
But that isn't in terms of the amplitude, as requested by the OP. You're also assuming the beam is Gaussian in just 1 transverse dimension. If the beam has a circularly symmetric intensity profile, things are different.
I believe this is the correct normalized Gaussian beam distribution in two dimensions:

I(x,y) = [I0/(σxσy2π)] exp[-x2/(2σx2) - y2/(2σy2)]

where ∫I(x,y) dx dy = I0, and σx and σy are the rms widths in the x and y dimensions.

At any point x and y, the intensity is equal to the square of the amplitude.

Bob S
 
Bob S said:
I believe this is the correct normalized Gaussian beam distribution in two dimensions:

I(x,y) = [I0/(σxσy2π)] exp[-x2/(2σx2) - y2/(2σy2)]

where ∫I(x,y) dx dy = I0, and σx and σy are the rms widths in the x and y dimensions.
I0 is perhaps a poor choice of variable name, in that it has different units than I(x,y). I.e., I0 is in Watts and I(x,y) is W/m2.

At any point x and y, the intensity is equal to the square of the amplitude.

Bob S
Not in SI units, or Gaussian-cgs units either. Assuming "the amplitude" refers to the electric field (And I can't imagine what else it would mean.)

(Electric field)2 has units of energy/m3 in Gaussian units, or [energy/(charge*distance)]2 in SI units. Neither is consistent with intensity = energy/(time*distance2), so I maintain that the relationship is proportional, but not equal.
 
I had this image on hand, thought I would share it. This is a power cross section of a gaussian laser beam. Each color represents a power level. Other beam parameters are given to the left.

4941far.jpg
 
Redbelly98 said:
I0 is perhaps a poor choice of variable name, in that it has different units than I(x,y). I.e., I0 is in Watts and I(x,y) is W/m2.Not in SI units, or Gaussian-cgs units either. Assuming "the amplitude" refers to the electric field (And I can't imagine what else it would mean.)

(Electric field)2 has units of energy/m3 in Gaussian units, or [energy/(charge*distance)]2 in SI units. Neither is consistent with intensity = energy/(time*distance2), so I maintain that the relationship is proportional, but not equal.
We consider a normalized bi-gaussian electromagnetic radiation beam traveling in the z direction.

The Poynting vector is P(x,y) = E(x,y) x H(x,y) watts/m2 at every point in space, where E(x,y) is in volts per meter, and H(x,y) is in amps per meter.

E(x,y)/H(x,y) = Z0 = 377 ohms in free space

So the power density is w(x,y) = E2(x,y)/(2·Z0) watts/m2

or E(x,y) = sqrt[2·Z0·w(x,y)] volts/m

where the bi-gaussian distribution is w(x,y) = [W0/(σxσy2π)] exp[-x2/(2σx2) - y2/(2σy2)] watts/m2

where the total beam power is W0 = ∫w(x,y) dx dy watts

Bob S
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K