Light intensity profile along all radial distances

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the intensity profile of a collimated light beam as it diverges over distance in air. Participants explore the theoretical frameworks and formulas applicable to non-laser light beams, contrasting them with laser and Gaussian beam models.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that beyond a certain distance from the source, the intensity of the beam follows the inverse square law, applicable to various types of waves.
  • Another participant questions the definition of "radial," seeking clarification on whether it refers to the radius of a sphere or the radius of the circular spot of light at a distance from the source.
  • A later reply corrects their earlier misunderstanding of "radius," explaining that a uniformly illuminated circular aperture produces an Airy pattern, characterized by a central lobe and sidelobes.
  • Participants discuss the concept of the radiation near field and its indistinct boundary, which is sometimes defined by the Rayleigh Distance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of radial distances in the context of light intensity profiles. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific theoretical approaches applicable to non-laser collimated beams.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the behavior of light intensity profiles due to varying definitions of radial distance and the complexities of different beam types.

XLAYZ
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have an ordinary light (not laser) collimated to produce a parallel beam. After traveling a distance in air, the beam has diverged significantly. The intensity decreases as the radial distance increases. Now I need to estimate the intensity profile along all radial distances inside the beam. All what I found was about laser beam and Gaussian beam, it is not the same thing. Could anyone please show me what theory and which formula I need to use?

Thank you in advance!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Once we are more than a certain distance from the source (the boundary of the Radiation Near Field), the intensity falls with the inverse square law. This applies along any radial.
The boundary of the radiation Near Field is quite indistinct, and for a collimated beam is sometimes given as the Rayleigh Distance = diameter of source^2 / 2 lambda.
The same applies to laser beams, radio beams and microwave beams, water waves etc.
 
When you say "radial" which radius do you mean? The radius ##R## of a sphere centered at the source or the radius ##r## of the circular spot of collimated light at distance ##R## from the source?
 
kuruman said:
When you say "radial" which radius do you mean? The radius ##R## of a sphere centered at the source or the radius ##r## of the circular spot of collimated light at distance ##R## from the source?
Sorry, I mean the radial distance from the axis of the beam with circular cross section.
 
Sorry, I had misunderstood the meaning of"radius". If the radiating aperture is circular and uniformly illuminated, we see a tapered central lobe, followed by a succession of nulls and gradually diminishing peaks, known as sidelobes. This is called an Airy pattern, named after the former Astronomer Royal. See Wiki, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Side_lobe
Close to the antenna, within the radiation near zone, the beam is essentially parallel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K