Interaction picture equation from Heisenberg equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the interaction picture equation from the Heisenberg picture equation of motion, specifically $$i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}A_H=[A_H,H]$$. The user encounters difficulty transitioning to the interaction picture equation $$i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}A_I=[A_I,H_0]+[A_I,V_I]$$ due to the presence of the potential term ##V## in the Hamiltonian ##H##. The user seeks clarification on how to eliminate the ##V## part while maintaining the integrity of the derivation, ultimately realizing that the non-commutativity of ##H_0## and ##V## complicates the transformation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically the Heisenberg and interaction pictures.
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics and the role of operators in quantum theory.
  • Knowledge of the mathematical formalism of commutators in quantum mechanics.
  • Experience with time evolution of quantum states and operators.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the interaction picture from the Schrödinger picture using $$A_I(t)=e^{iH_0t/\hbar}A_Se^{-iH_0t/\hbar}$$.
  • Explore the implications of non-commuting operators in quantum mechanics, particularly in Hamiltonian dynamics.
  • Investigate the role of the interaction Hamiltonian $$V_I$$ in perturbation theory.
  • Review Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics" for detailed examples and explanations of the Heisenberg and interaction pictures.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists specializing in quantum field theory, and researchers working on time evolution in quantum systems will benefit from this discussion.

copernicus1
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
The standard Heisenberg picture equation of motion is $$i\hbar\frac d{dt}A_H=[A_H,H],$$ assuming no explicit ##t##-dependence on the Heisenberg-picture operator ##A_H##. I've been trying to go directly from this equation to the corresponding interaction-picture equation, $$i\hbar\frac d{dt}A_I=[A_I,H_0],$$ (see Sakurai 5.5.12) which I thought at first would be simple, but I keep coming up with $$i\hbar\frac d{dt}A_I=[A_I,H_0]+[A_I,V_I],$$ where ##V_I## is the interaction part of the hamiltonian in the interaction picture. The basic problem is that in the original equation ##H## contains both ##H_0## and ##V## and I don't know how to get rid of the ##V## part. Has anyone been through this calculation?

Thanks!

P.S. I know I could just start with ##A_I(t)=e^{iH_0t/\hbar}A_Se^{-iH_0t/\hbar}##, where ##A_S## is in the Schrödinger picture, and I can derive the equation this way, but I feel like it should work the other way too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you please show your derivation?
 
I start with $$i\hbar\frac{}d{dt}A_H(t)=[A_H(t),H_H(t)]$$ (subscript means Heisenberg picture) and plug in ##A_H(t)=e^{iH_St/\hbar}A_Se^{-iH_St/\hbar}## and ##H_H(t)=e^{iH_St/\hbar}H_Se^{-iH_St/\hbar}##. (I then replace ##H_S=H_{0,S}+V_S## everywhere and transform both sides of the original Heisenberg equation using $$i\hbar\frac{}d{dt}e^{-iV_St/\hbar}A_H(t)e^{iV_St/\hbar}=e^{-iV_St/\hbar}[A_H(t),H_H(t)]e^{iV_St/\hbar}.$$ Simplify and I'm left with $$i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}A_I(t)=A_I(t)e^{iH_{0,S}t/\hbar}H_Se^{-iH_{0,S}t/\hbar}-e^{iH_{0,S}t/\hbar}H_Se^{-iH_{0,S}t/\hbar}A_I(t),$$ but ##H_S\neq H_{0,S}##. If it did I would be done. Instead it's ##H_S=H_{0,S}+V_S##. This is where I get stuck.
 
copernicus1 said:
I then replace ##H_S=H_{0,S}+V_S## everywhere
I guess this is where it doesn't work. Since ##[H_0, V] \neq 0##, ##e^{i (H_0 + V) t/ \hbar} \neq e^{i H_0 t/ \hbar} e^{i V t/ \hbar}##.
 
Ah, interesting! Thanks for pointing that out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K