Interesting and annoying power problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter diegojco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interesting Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a particle influenced by a force defined as F=6+4x-3(x^2). The initial speed of the particle is 0 m/s at x=0, and the total work done by the force between x=0 and x=3 is calculated to be 9 Joules. To find the power at x=3, the participants suggest using the relationship between work and kinetic energy, emphasizing that time is not necessary for calculating power. They also highlight that power can be expressed as the product of force and velocity. Ultimately, the conversation leads to a simplified approach using conservation of energy and the chain rule for integration.
diegojco
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I have a trouble with this problem:

Suppose you have a particle with mass 30Kg, this particle is in influence of a force F that acts along the x-axis and F=6+4x-3(x^2) and at x=0 the particle has 0m/s speed. Find the total work made by F between x=0 and x=3, then find the power given to the particle when x=3. (answers= 9 Joules and 22 Watts)

Well the first thing is easy, only I have to integrate F between 0 and 3. but the second question I can't see what's to be done. I try to use the fact that if I have the work I must get the final time but I don't have an expression for the trayectory.

Another way I have tried is to get the function of position by the fact that

F=ma, a=F/m dv/dt=(6+4x-3(x^2))/m

this is a partial differential equation involving the second derivative of a function u(x,t) and the general solution I get is:

u(x,t)=a(x)+b(x)t+(t^2)((6+4x-3(x^2))/2m)

but I don't have the sufficient conditions to get a good boundary problem or initial problem to separate a particular solution.

My questions are: what conditions could I put, or what other way, easier, could I take to solve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mdv/dt = 6 + 4x -3x^2 is a seperable second order differential equation.

problem: there are no v terms in the force only x terms.
solution: note that F is a position dependent force.

problem: can't find a term for time.
solution: is time really nescessary for finding power?

this is a much better way to formulate the problem. nevermind about parioal derivatives and general solutions and whatever else. you don't need all that for this.
 
By conservation of energy, the work done is equal to the change in kinetic energy, which is 1/2mv^2. Use your answer to the first part and solve for v. Power is Fv.
 
Thanks

Thanks for the thinking. Another problem that is easier than i have wonder.
 
power = work/time
=((force*distance)/time
= force* (distance/time)
= force*velocity

to find the velocity

dv/dt = dv/dx (dx/dt) = dv/dx *v from the chain rule.

vdv = Fdx

perform the integral. done.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top