Interference of electromagnetic waves

Click For Summary
Electromagnetic waves can interfere with each other due to the superposition principle, where their amplitudes add linearly. For observable patterns of constructive and destructive interference, the waves should have similar frequencies and phase differences close to zero or 180 degrees. The symmetry of the interference pattern is influenced by the phase differences between the waves. In a gas, the emitted EM waves have random phases and directions, making consistent interference unlikely unless they are traveling in nearly the same direction. Overall, while interference can occur, it is often complex and dependent on specific conditions.
freddyfish
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
I haven't been able to find any literature that answers this question in a pleasing way. Also, all sources on the internet are contradictory.

If electromagnetic waves (out of phase since they are emitted by the gaseous atoms in discharge tube) sent through a diffraction gitter interfered with each other there would not be a symmetric interference pattern. When performing some diffraction experiment, a symmetric pattern obviously arises at the screen though. The same frequency is obviously not enough for the waves to interfere, so I wonder:

What are the criteria for electromagnetic waves to interfere with each other? None of my teachers has been able to answer this question properly and I have received the most unreasonable answers you can possably imagine. :p

Thanks //F
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi freddyfish,

Since EM waves obey the superposition principle (their amplitudes add linearly) waves from different sources pretty much always interfere with each other as they traverse the same location at the same time.

What you are probably most interested in though is when you can observe obvious patterns of constructive and destructive interference. Those are more easily observable if the frequencies lie near each other (or near multiples of each other) and their phase differences are closer towards zero or 180 degrees and when either the wave trajectories are parallel or anti-parallel (or possibly near to perpendicular).

Whether the pattern is symmetric or not I believe is determined by the particular phase differences between the frequency components of both waves. Monochromatic interfering waves near each other in frequency shouldn't produce an asymmetrical pattern (unless they are undergoing refraction or are impinging at an angle on each other).
 
Last edited:
freddyfish said:
If electromagnetic waves (out of phase since they are emitted by the gaseous atoms in discharge tube) sent through a diffraction gitter interfered with each other there would not be a symmetric interference pattern. When performing some diffraction experiment, a symmetric pattern obviously arises at the screen though. The same frequency is obviously not enough for the waves to interfere.
Thanks //F

The EM waves emitted by atoms in a gas are not "out of phase". They have random phases, and there is a difference. They are also emitted in random directions. Two EM waves cannot cancel each other out (interfere destructively) or add together (interfere constructively) unless they are traveling in practically the same direction. So if you pick two atoms in the gas, chances are they will not be interfering with each other, because chances are they will not be emitting in the same direction. When you look at a gas of emitting atoms, all you see are the atoms that happen to be emitting in more or less your direction. Even then, since the phases are random, there will not be complete cancelling. There will be some constructive interference, some destructive interference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K