Can an axisymmetric electric field be created without charges?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of creating an axisymmetric electric field without the presence of charges. Participants explore the implications of wave interference and the characteristics of electric fields generated by such waves, considering both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that an electric field can be created through the interference of similarly polarized waves traveling in opposite directions, questioning whether this would result in a symmetric field or a net field of zero at any point.
  • Others argue that a field accelerating charges in opposite directions on each side of an axis does not qualify as axisymmetric, as it changes direction and thus does not maintain symmetry upon rotation.
  • There is a suggestion that if charges are accelerated away from the axis from every side, this could still maintain axial symmetry, depending on the interpretation of the field's behavior.
  • One participant acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the direction of acceleration and clarifies that the field described has non-zero divergence on the axis, implying a non-zero charge density there.
  • Another participant raises the question of whether the scenario discussed is merely an idealization of two colliding waves and whether the electric forces from such waves would cancel out in practice.
  • It is noted that while regions of cancellation of electric fields could occur, this would not be uniform across all areas, indicating complexity in the behavior of the fields involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definition of axisymmetry and the implications of wave interference on electric fields. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing interpretations and no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of axisymmetry and the idealization of wave interactions, which may not fully capture the complexities of real-world scenarios.

Christofer Br
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
That is, a field that accelerates charges in opposite directions on each side of an axis. I was thinking about interference of similarly polarized waves traveling in opposite directions (so that electric field peaks and valleys overlap but magnetic field adds constructively) - would there be an symmetric field or just no net field at any point ? If the latter, are there any other possibilities?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Christofer Br said:
That is, a field that accelerates charges in opposite directions on each side of an axis (looking in 2D).
Such a field would not be axisymmeteic. Axisymmetric means that if you rotate it about an axis then there is no change. Having it change directions would not qualify.
 
Dale said:
Such a field would not be axisymmeteic. Axisymmetric means that if you rotate it about an axis then there is no change. Having it change directions would not qualify.
If it accelerates charges away from the axis from every side, there's no change upon rotation - hence axial symmetry (by 2D I meant 2D projection, to make it easier to visualize). Anyway, do you now know the answer?
 
Christofer Br said:
That is, a field that accelerates charges in opposite directions on each side of an axis. I was thinking about interference of similarly polarized waves traveling in opposite directions (so that electric field peaks and valleys overlap but magnetic field adds constructively) - would there be an symmetric field or just no net field at any point ? If the latter, are there any other possibilities?

Christofer Br said:
If it accelerates charges away from the axis from every side, there's no change upon rotation - hence axial symmetry (by 2D I meant 2D projection, to make it easier to visualize). Anyway, do you now know the answer?

This is not very clear. Are you talking about something having, say, a cylindrical TEM mode symmetry?

Zz.
 
Christofer Br said:
If it accelerates charges away from the axis from every side, there's no change upon rotation - hence axial symmetry (by 2D I meant 2D projection, to make it easier to visualize).
Oops, sorry. I misunderstood what you meant by opposite direction. I was thinking opposite directions parallel to the axis.

Christofer Br said:
Anyway, do you now know the answer?
Yes, the field you describe has non zero divergence on the axis, so the charge density is non zero there also.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Christofer Br
Dale said:
Oops, sorry. I misunderstood what you meant by opposite direction. I was thinking opposite directions parallel to the axis.

Yes, the field you describe has non zero divergence on the axis, so the charge density is non zero there also.
Is the case that we considered only an idealization (of just two waves colliding)? I mean, when you have a real, physical stream of waves, would the electric force from them cancel out (mostly)?
 
Christofer Br said:
Is the case that we considered only an idealization (of just two waves colliding)?
You could certainly consider two plane waves colliding. It would not be axisymmetric, but it would have no charge.

Christofer Br said:
would the electric force from them cancel out (mostly)?
If you had one wave with the E field along x and the B field along y then it would propagate along z. The other wave could have the E field along -x and the B field along z so it would propagate along y. There would be regions where the E fields would cancel out, but that would not happen everywhere.

Edit: You could also have the other wave with E along -x and B along y so it would propagate along -z. In that case there would be moments where the E fields would cancel out everywhere, but it would not happen all the time.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K