Interference of microwave transmitters of different wavelengths

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interference patterns produced by two microwave transmitters with differing wavelengths. When both transmitters have the same wavelength, a clear interference pattern is expected; however, halving the wavelength of one transmitter introduces different frequencies, raising questions about coherence and the resulting pattern. It is noted that while an interference pattern will still form, it will change over time due to the varying phase relationships between the waves. The analysis suggests that the intensity of the resultant wave remains consistent, but the points of maximum and minimum intensity will shift. Ultimately, the interference pattern will be more complex and dynamic than initially anticipated.
DomPhillips
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
This question is about the interference pattern observed when the waves from two microwave transmitters interfere.

The first parts of the question involve the wavelengths of microwaves being the same for each transmitter. For the last part the question proposes that the wavelength of one of the microwave transmitters is halved (from 30 mm to 15 mm). The question asks what observational effect this will have on the interference pattern.

Now at first glance I notice that since the wavelengths are not the same for both microwaves the two microwave sources have different frequencies and are therefore no longer coherent sources, and thus I would intuitively expect no interference pattern to occur. Am I correct? Or is there some new interference pattern that would form in this situation?




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
There will, technically, be an interference pattern - it will look different though.
There is a clue here that the pattern will change with time. The question is: how?

The trick is to imagine you have a detector in a position where the first experiment gets a maximum, then work out what it would see if the wavelength of one source were halved. Repeat for when the detector is at a minima.
 
I'm struggling to see how the interference pattern would change with time since both microwaves are obviously propagating at the same velocity.

Also I used wolfram alpha to try and visualize the resultant wave at different points on the 'interference pattern' I found that if I add two sine waves as follows (where a could take any value from 0 to 1)...

f(x) = sin(x) + sin(2x + a\pi)

...then, regardless of the phase difference between the waves, the resultant wave always seemed to have the same overall intensity - i.e. no points of maximum/minimum intensity seemed to form, and certainly no completely destructive interference as is the case with the sum sin(x) + sin(x + \pi).
 
The wavefronts from the two sources are traveling waves.
If the wavelength is different, they do not maintain the same phase relationship - at some times they will be in phase and at others out of phase.

But if you are happy with your analysis - then that is the answer you should put.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top