MHB Intermediate Value Theorem .... Browder, Theorem 3.16 .... ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem Value
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the proof of Theorem 3.16 from Andrew Browder's "Mathematical Analysis: An Introduction," specifically regarding the continuity of a function at a point. It emphasizes that if a function f is continuous at b and f(b) > y, then there exists a delta such that f(t) > y for all t in a specified interval around b. The proof utilizes the concept of a new function g defined as g(b) = f(b) - y, which remains positive due to the continuity of f. The sign-preserving property of continuous functions is also highlighted as a means to establish the required inequalities. This thorough exploration aids in grasping the implications of continuity in the context of the Intermediate Value Theorem.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Andrew Browder's book: "Mathematical Analysis: An Introduction" ... ...

I am currently reading Chapter 3: Continuous Functions on Intervals and am currently focused on Section 3.1 Limits and Continuity ... ...

I need some help in understanding the proof of Theorem 3.16 ...Theorem 3.16 and its proof read as follows:
View attachment 9549
View attachment 9550
In the above proof by Andrew Browder we read the following:

" ... ... But $$f(b) \gt y$$ implies (since $$f$$ is continuous at $$b$$) that there exists $$\delta \gt 0$$ such that $$f(t) \gt y$$ for all $$t$$ with $$b - \delta \lt t \leq b$$. ... ... "My question is as follows:

How do we demonstrate explicitly and rigorously that since $$f$$ is continuous at $$b$$ and $$f(b) \gt y $$ therefore we have that there exists $$\delta \gt 0$$ such that $$f(t) \gt y$$ for all $$t$$ with $$b - \delta \lt t \leq b$$. ... ... Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter

***NOTE***

The relevant definition of one-sided continuity for the above is as follows:

$$f$$ is continuous from the left at $$b$$ implies that for every $$\epsilon \gt 0$$ there exists $$\delta \gt 0$$ such that for all $$x \in [a, b]$$ ...

we have that $$b - \delta \lt x \lt b \Longrightarrow \mid f(x) - f(b) \mid \lt \epsilon$$
 

Attachments

  • Browder - 1 -  Theorem 3.16 ... ... PART 1 ... .png
    Browder - 1 - Theorem 3.16 ... ... PART 1 ... .png
    3.8 KB · Views: 158
  • Browder - 2 -  Theorem 3.16 ... ... PART 2 .png
    Browder - 2 - Theorem 3.16 ... ... PART 2 .png
    14.9 KB · Views: 137
Physics news on Phys.org
We have $f(b) > y$ or $f(b)-y >0$. Define $g(b) = f(b)-y>0$.

Since $f$ is continuous at $b$, $g$ is continuous at $b$.

Thus for all $\epsilon_0 >0$, there exist $\delta_0 >0$ s.t. $t \in [a,b]$ and $|t-b|<\delta_0 $ imply $|g(t)-g(b)| < \epsilon_0$.

In particular, for $ \epsilon := g(b)/2>0$ there exists $\delta >0$ s.t. $t \in [a,b]$ and $|t-b|<\delta $ imply $|g(t)-g(b)| < g(b)/2$.

Therefore $-g(b)/2 <g(t)-g(b) < g(b)/2$. Hence $g(t)> g(b)-g(b)/2 = g(b)/2$.

Rewriting $g(t) > g(b)/2$ in terms of $f$ we have $f(t) > \frac{1}{2}(f(b)+y)> \frac{1}{2}(y+y) = y$ as $f(b)>y$.

Thus $f(t)>y$ whenever $t \in [a,b]$ and $|t-b|<\delta $; that's $t \in [a,b] \cap (b-\delta, b+\delta)$, i.e. whenever $b-\delta < t \le b.$

This calculation can be skipped by appealing to sign-preserving property of limits/continuous functions:

Sign-preserving property (for continuous functions): Let $f: I \to \mathbb{R}$ be continuous at $ c \in I \subseteq \mathbb{R}$.

1. If $f(c)>0$ then there exists $M>0$ and $\delta >0$ s.t. $x \in I$ and $|x-c|< \delta$ implies $f(x) > M$.

2. If $f(c)<0$ then there exists $N<0$ and $\delta >0$ s.t. $x \in I$ and $|x-c|< \delta$ implies $f(x) <N$.
 
Last edited:
MountEvariste said:
We have $f(b) > y$ or $f(b)-y >0$. Define $g(b) = f(b)-y>0$.

Since $f$ is continuous at $b$, $g$ is continuous at $b$.

Thus for all $\epsilon_0 >0$, there exist $\delta_0 >0$ s.t. $t \in [a,b]$ and $|t-b|<\delta_0 $ imply $|g(t)-g(b)| < \epsilon_0$.

In particular, for $ \epsilon := g(b)/2>0$ there exists $\delta >0$ s.t. $t \in [a,b]$ and $|t-b|<\delta $ imply $|g(t)-g(b)| < g(b)/2$.

Therefore $-g(b)/2 <g(t)-g(b) < g(b)/2$. Hence $g(t)> g(b)-g(b)/2 = g(b)/2$.

Rewriting $g(t) > g(b)/2$ in terms of $f$ we have $f(t) > \frac{1}{2}(f(b)+y)> \frac{1}{2}(y+y) = y$ as $f(b)>y$.

Thus $f(t)>y$ whenever $t \in [a,b]$ and $|t-b|<\delta $; that's $t \in [a,b] \cap (b-\delta, b+\delta)$, i.e. whenever $b-\delta < t \le b.$

This calculation can be skipped by appealing to sign-preserving property of limits/continuous functions:

Sign-preserving property (for continuous functions): Let $f: I \to \mathbb{R}$ be continuous at $ c \in I \subseteq \mathbb{R}$.

1. If $f(c)>0$ then there exists $M>0$ and $\delta >0$ s.t. $x \in I$ and $|x-c|< \delta$ implies $f(x) > M$.

2. If $f(c)<0$ then there exists $N<0$ and $\delta >0$ s.t. $x \in I$ and $|x-c|< \delta$ implies $f(x) <N$.
Thanks MountEvariste for an informative and really helpful reply ...

Now working through what you have written ...

Thanks again ...

Peter
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K