Intermeshing rotor helicopters/synchropters hard to fly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter carmatic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Rotor
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 4K views
carmatic
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
i was reading an article about the Kaman K-max being used as a UAV, and there were comments about how this helicopter is harder to fly than a traditional main-and-tail-rotor helicopter ... the large number of accidents of the K-max also seems to suggest the same thing

why is this? to me, the symmetrical design of the helicopter is intuinitive, if you showed a synchropter and a normal helicopter to person who has never seen a helicopter and asked them to fly it, the person would likely choose the synchropter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Afaik, the Kaman is in fact easier to fly than conventional helicopters, thanks to the absence of torque effects.
The vehicle has been used mostly for short haul cargo hoist operations, by loggers and builders. That kind of work tends to be more accident prone than the normal helicopter usage, which is mostly shuttling people from one landing site to another.