Interpretation of a signal (sound) spectrum - hydrophones

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the interpretation of a sound spectrum from hydrophones, specifically noting that the fundamental frequency is approximately 40 kHz. There is uncertainty regarding a large 210 kHz signal, which may be an alias, and the presence of second and third harmonics is acknowledged without clear causation. The original poster mentions that the paper suggests these harmonics result from non-linear effects in the liquid, but they express a need to verify if the driver might be responsible instead. The poster has resolved their initial confusion but continues to seek clarification on the harmonics. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of analyzing sound spectra in hydrophone studies.
rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
ooops so obvious sorry! please delete
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The 40kHz is from the axis. The fundamental appears at about 0.4 on the scale, which is per 105 Hz, so that is 0.4 x 105 Hz, or 40 kHz.
As for the rest, it's not at all clear to me. They don't seem to mention the large 210 kHz signal which is the same size as the fundamental. Maybe this is an alias? The symmetry makes me think this.
The second and third harmonics appear in b,c & d, but as to what causes them there's no indication.
Edit: I haven't read the paper, though they appear to be claiming the harmonics are due to non-linear effects in the liquid. I would want to check carefully that it's not non-linear effects in the driver.
 
  • Like
Likes rwooduk
Thanks for the reply, i just figured it out as i posted and can't delete the thread. Thank you though!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top