Interpretation of tensor indices

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the physical interpretation of tensor indices, particularly in the context of anisotropic materials and susceptibility. It explains that a tensor element, such as susceptibility xx,y, indicates the response in the x-direction to an electric field applied in the y-direction. The conversation also explores the implications of higher-dimensional tensors, like a 3-index tensor, which can represent multiple input vectors and a single output vector. A specific example is provided with a 4-index tensor in the geodesic deviation equation, illustrating how it can act on different vectors. Overall, the interpretation of tensor indices varies based on the application and the number of vectors involved.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am trying to figure out the physical interpretation of tensor indices. E.g., if we have an anisotropic material, then the tensor element of the susceptibility xx,y gives the response in the x-direction of an electric field in the y-direction.

Lets not go up one dimension and look at e.g. xx,y,z. This I guess gives the response in the x-direction of an electric field in the y- and z-direction?


Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Niles! :smile:
Niles said:
I am trying to figure out the physical interpretation of tensor indices.

It depends what you apply them to.

Susceptibility has one input vector and one output vector.

A 3-index tensor could have two different input vectors and one output vector, or one input vector used twice, and one output vector, or vice versa.

For a 4-index example, take the geodesic deviation equation:

\frac{D^2\,\delta x^{\alpha}}{D\tau^2}\ =\ -\,R^{\alpha}_{\ \mu\beta\sigma}\,V^{\mu}\,V^{\sigma}\,\delta x^{\beta}

Here, the 4-index tensor R acts on x, and on V twice (that's two input vectors of which one is used twice, and one output vector), but an identical tensor could conceivably act on three different vectors. :wink:
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top