Interpreting the Physical Function of the Hamiltonian in Classical Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter akshaykatre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian
akshaykatre
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
hey guys,

this may be a little naive but, I can someone explain to me the physical aspect of the Hamiltonian?
In the sense that if had to physically interpret its function, could I do it and if so how?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In many cases the Hamiltonian is simply the total energy. This isn't really a question about nuclear or particle physics. You might want to post in the classical physics forum instead.
 
hey thanks for the reply,
i thought about it again.. and maybe i have an idea what it could be... but I'm going to try teh question in the classical physics forum anyways..
thanks though for the reply!
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top