Interrelationship between power of 2 and integer length

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the length of digits in powers of 2 and their exponent. The length of an integer x in base 10 is determined by the formula ⌊log₁₀(x)⌋ + 1, which for x = 2^n simplifies to ⌊n log₁₀(2)⌋ + 1. Participants note that the digit length increases linearly with n, while the actual value of 2^n grows exponentially. The conversation also touches on the implicit function 10^y = 2^x, highlighting a constant relationship between y and x. This mathematical exploration reveals the predictable pattern in the growth of powers of 2 in terms of digit length.
Nile3
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Hello, I was wondering if someone knew the equation which describe the exact or statistical relation between the length(# of digits) of a power of 2 based on it's power.

I plotted 200 of the powers in mathematica and I get a fairly straightforward staircase plot. I'm just wondering what's the rule here.

4.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The length of an integer ##x## in basis 10 is given by ##\lfloor\log_{10}(x)\rfloor+1##, where the strange brackets denote the largest integer smaller or equal than ##x##. So if ##x=2^n##, then the length is

\lfloor \log_{10}(2^n)\rfloor + 1 \sim n\log_{10}(2) + 1
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
If the number of digits of a number increases linearly, the number increases exponentially; if the exponent of a number increases linearly, the number increases exponentially. Basically you've plotted the implicit function 10^y = 2^x.

y/x = b is a constant because the equation 2 = 10^b has one root. To estimate b consider 2^10 = 1024 and 10^3 = 1000.
 
Last edited:
n * (memorize 0.3 as log[10,2]) +1, excellent, thanks!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top