Intersection of maximal ideal with subring

  • Thread starter Thread starter coquelicot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intersection
coquelicot
Messages
295
Reaction score
67
Let R be an integral ring (eventually can be supposed integrally closed), and R' an integral extension of R. Assume that M is a maximal ideal of R'. Must the intersection of M with R be a maximal ideal of R ?

Thx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is an integral ring the same as an integral domain? And what's is an integral extension? (I get the impression that you mean somrthing like the extension of the natural numbers to the integers.)
 
coquelicot said:
Let R be an integral ring (eventually can be supposed integrally closed), and R' an integral extension of R. Assume that M is a maximal ideal of R'. Must the intersection of M with R be a maximal ideal of R ?

Thx.

This follows from the following two lemma's:

Lemma 1: If ##R\subseteq R^\prime## are rings such that ##R^\prime## is integral over ##R##, and if ##J## is an ideal of ##R^\prime## and if ##I=R\cap J##, then ##R^\prime/J## is integral over ##R/I##.

Proof: Take ##x\in R^\prime##, then we have some equation
x^n + a_1x^{n-1} + ... + a_n = 0
with ##a_i \in R##. Reducing this modulo ##J## then yields that ##x+J## is integral over ##R/I##.

Lemma 2: Let ##R\subseteq R^\prime## be integral domains such that ##R^\prime## is integral over ##R##. Then ##R## is a field if and only if ##R^\prime## is a field.

Proof: If ##R## is a field, then let ##y\in R^\prime## be nonzero. Then there is some equation
y^n + a_1y^{n-1} + ... + a_n = 0
with ##a_i \in R##. We can take this equation of smallest possible degree. But then
y^{-1} = -a_n^{-1}(y^{n-1} + a_1 y^{n-2} + ... + a_{n-1})
note that ##a_n\neq 0## because of the integral domain requirement. Thus ##R^\prime## is a field.

Conversely, if ##R^\prime## is a field and if ##x\in R## is nonzero, then ##x^{-1}## is integral over ##R## and thus satisfies an equation
x^{-n} + a_1x^{-n+1} + ... + a_n=0
It follows that ##x^{-1} = - (a_1 + a_2x + ... + a_nx^{n-1})\in R##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
FOR ERLAND : 1) Yes, I meant integral domain. 2) I meant that every element x of R' is integral over R.
MICROMASS : You are the best of the best. thanks a lot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top