Intersellar - NY Times article on its science

AI Thread Summary
David Overby's _Out There_ column in the New York Times examines the physics depicted in the film _Interstellar_ and how it has been received by audiences. The article highlights the inherent challenges of compressing complex scientific concepts into a two-hour narrative, which can lead to a disconnect between science and storytelling. Overbye suggests that _Interstellar_ serves as a response to the mysticism found in _2001: A Space Odyssey_, emphasizing themes of family and the idea that "home" transcends physical location. While the film advocates for fundamental research and space exploration, it critiques grandiose notions of saving humanity, presenting a more grounded perspective on human experience. The article is available in print on page D1 and online through the provided links.
diogenesNY
Messages
230
Reaction score
259
Today's _Out There_ column ( in the New York Times) by David Overby takes a look at the physics of _Interstellar_ and the reception thereof by various audiences.

Interesting article. It can be found on page D1 of the print edition.

Links- (One is the article's formal permalink, the other is a cut'n'paste from the web page... belt and suspenders):

http://nyti.ms/1t5jmPi

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/18/s...he-cinema-of-physicists.html?ref=science&_r=0

Enjoy,
diogenesNY
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting article, I posted a thread on the book too. There's always a disconnect between the science and the story due to compression of events into a two hour format that can't be helped. So I look at it for what it is and enjoy the special effects as shown.

I can't wait to see the movie,
 
I agree with Overbye that the 5 dimensional beings could be the ones that put the monoliths in 2001. But I don't think it is cheating. I think Interstellar is in part a reaction to the mysticism of 2001. Interstellar's message is, as Overbye says, "I'd rather stay at home". But home is not a specific location, it is family. Interstellar does argue for grand ideas like fundamental research and space exploration, but it argues against grandiose ideas like saving the human race or whatever the ending of 2001 means.
 
I wonder how much stories were written, that involve space fighters, and arent so soft as Star wars. I dont think missiles totally make fighter craft obsolate, for example the former cant escort shuttles if one wants to capture a celestial body. I dont insist fighters have to be manned (i enjoyed Enders game about someone control the events for afar) but i also think it isnt totally unjustifiable.
So far I've been enjoying the show but I am curious to hear from those a little more knowledgeable of the Dune universe as my knowledge is only of the first Dune book, The 1984 movie, The Sy-fy channel Dune and Children of Dune mini series and the most recent two movies. How much material is it pulling from the Dune books (both the original Frank Herbert and the Brian Herbert books)? If so, what books could fill in some knowledge gaps?
I thought I had discovered a giant plot hole in Avatar universe, but apparently it's based on a faulty notion. So, the anti-gravity effect that lifts whole mountains into the sky is unrelated to the unobtanium deposits? Apparently the value of unobtanium is in its property as a room temperature superconductor, which enables their superluminal drive technology. Unobtanium is found in large deposits underground, which is why they want to mine the ground. OK. So, these mountains - which...

Similar threads

Back
Top