Intervals with Transcendental Outputs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hertz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    intervals
Hertz
Messages
180
Reaction score
8
Maybe I'm getting a bit ahead of myself here, but for the sake of curiosity I'll ask it anyways. Is there any way that you can test when a function h(x) will have transcendental outputs vs rational or algebraic outputs?

Specifically, if I have the following function
f(x) = ssrt(x)

Where ssrt is the inverse of a second degree power tower (ssrt(x^x) = x).
Meaning, for a given value of x, the ssrt() function will give me the number that when raised to the power of itself equals x.

Good examples of this function are ssrt(4) = 2 because 2^2 = 4 and ssrt(27) = 3 because 3^3 = 27.​

Would it be possible to find the x intervals that make f(x) transcendental?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I doubt that there are intervals as solution. Generally you should look up Lambert's W-function and the Gelfond-Schneider theorem.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top