Interview with Instrument Engineer Jim Hardy - Comments

In summary, understanding is not gained by classifying things, but by understanding the underlying principles."
  • #1
19,407
9,949
TheAdmin submitted a new PF Insights post

Interview with Instrument Engineer Jim Hardy

jimhardy.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto, anorlunda, CalcNerd and 1 other person
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #3
I think your "Symphony Orchestra" comment was very unexpected and interesting. I've also had some interest in nuclear reactors ever since I got to view the inside of a live reactor on a Russian nuclear ice breaker a few years ago.
 
  • #4
Thanks Guys.

I still remember vividly my parents taking my sister and me to a children's concert when we were eight-ish years old.
The moment the orchestra started i was engulfed with a tingling sensation , the sound of the live strings seemed to enter my brain and soothed me clear down to my toes as if i were standing in a cool , gentle waterfall..
I wonder what is the neurological affect of music. A pleasant melody picks up and carries my psyche. My sister described Mozart's Requiem as "A backrub for your soul." His Horn Concerto #4 puts me in a near trance, but i recently played it for my friends and they were indifferent. We're just not all wired the same, i guess. Maybe somebody will do one of those science shows where they show brain activity with a scanner . An icebreaker ? How'd you get to tour one of those ?
I took the engine room tour on Alaska Ferry (MV Columbia) , and just wandered down into engine room of the Cape May (NJ) ferryboat .
 
  • #5
Mr. Hardy, I loved a comment you made on one of the fora about a year and a half ago (Transmission line voltage loss) wherein you said. "As Sophie says, "Classification is the enemy of understanding.". That comment jibed with lessons that I have taken from life and I should like to quote you on that from time to time but Sophie says mystifies me. So my question is Is there some more history to this quotation? Just who is Sophie?
Thanks, You may reply to [personal e-mail removed by mentor] if you wish.

Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/transmission-line-voltage-loss.812451/page-2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
John Green said:
Mr. Hardy, I loved a comment you made on one of the fora about a year and a half ago (Transmission line voltage loss) wherein you said. "As Sophie says, "Classification is the enemy of understanding.". That comment jibed with lessons that I have taken from life and I should like to quote you on that from time to time but Sophie says mystifies me. So my question is Is there some more history to this quotation? Just who is Sophie?
Thanks, You may reply to [personal e-mail removed by mentor] if you wish.

Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/transmission-line-voltage-loss.812451/page-2
I heard someone rattle my cage. :smile:

My point about Classification was aimed at Classification for its own sake, without the backup of any understanding. Arranging items into groups with similar characteristics can be very useful but NOT if one hasn't a clue about what those characteristics actually mean. I speak from years of experience of students trying to rely on learned 'lists' in order to work out a problem. Such an approach gets in the way of real learning and understanding. Rote learning of certain things is, of course, essential and you can't go through life working things out from scratch but you can't work anything out with classification alone.
"Nature abhors a vacuum" will take you quite a long way in the design of a rudimentary pump and knowing the Periods and Groups of the table of elements will get you points in a Quiz but neither of those can make you a Scientist.
 
  • #8
sophiecentaur said:
I heard someone rattle my cage. :smile:

Wasn't me...

*Puts away the stick and whistles innocently*

I will say that I recently had a "mini-epiphany" about this Sophie, but alas, I can't remember what it was about. :sorry:
 
  • #9
Drakkith said:
I will say that I recently had a "mini-epiphany" about this Sophie, but alas, I can't remember what it was about.
Ask the Matron. She often helps me out at times like this. :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith
  • #10
Thanks guys. Then I shall quote Sophie.
 

1. What is your background in instrument engineering?

I have a bachelor's degree in Electrical Engineering and a master's degree in Instrumentation and Control. I have been working as an instrument engineer for over 10 years.

2. Can you explain the role of an instrument engineer in the scientific field?

An instrument engineer is responsible for designing, developing, and maintaining instruments used in scientific research and experiments. This includes creating specifications, selecting appropriate instruments, and troubleshooting any issues that arise.

3. What are some challenges you face in your job as an instrument engineer?

One of the main challenges is keeping up with constantly evolving technology and techniques in the scientific field. It is also important to ensure that the instruments are accurate and reliable for accurate data collection.

4. How do you ensure the accuracy of instruments in scientific experiments?

We perform regular calibrations and maintenance on the instruments, as well as thorough testing before and after use. We also follow strict protocols and standards to ensure the accuracy of our data.

5. What advice do you have for aspiring instrument engineers?

My advice would be to have a strong foundation in electrical engineering and to continuously update your knowledge and skills in the field. It is also important to have a keen attention to detail and problem-solving skills.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
4
Replies
132
Views
11K
Back
Top